Pass
Rating icon - Chlorophyll a Rating icon - Total Nitrogen Rating icon - Total Phosphorous Rating icon - Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

4 out of 4 indicators were rated as PASS.

All four indicators must pass for the creek to be rated as PASS.

Learn more about how this report is created

  • Size: 35,771 acres
  • Location: North Sarasota County, south Manatee County
  • Discharges into: Sarasota Bay

For more information, please see: Phillippi Creek Flood Study Update (2001)

View county-wide water quality trends »

Phillippi Creek

Phillippi Creek

Water Chemistry Ratings | Freshwater Portion of the Creek

Creek Conditions Ratings are based on comparing nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorophyll and dissolved oxygen to water quality guidelines or regulations. Florida law defines a maximum allowable concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus, and chlorophyll a, and a minimum allowable concentration of dissolved oxygen in these streams. Learn more about these ratings and how they are calculated »

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1937
  • 1941
  • 1966
  • 1971
  • 1971A
Chart Legend
  • Trend Line
  • Annual Mean
  • Threshold
Pass

Chlorophyll a

Score: Pass
Units: mg/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 1.573 1.573
Mean 0.0041 0.0044 0.04696871
Low 0.0002 0.00
No. of Samples 157 3,782

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean
Pass

Nitrogen, Total

Score: Pass
Units: mg/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 11.608 21.845
Mean 1.3707 1.3367 2.07218901
Low 0.575 0.124
No. of Samples 149 3,261

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean
Pass

Phosphorus, Total

Score: Pass
Units: mg/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 1.59 7.36
Mean 0.3796 0.3803 0.36817242
Low 0.031 0.008
No. of Samples 149 3,775

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean
Pass

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Low DO saturation also may be naturally influenced by inflows from nearby wetlands or groundwater sources.
Score: Pass
Units: percent (%) Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 127.205 262.40
Mean 53.49 61.37 28.73826
Low 0.00 0.00
No. of Samples 149 3,726

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 9.53 21.30
Mean 1.47 1.36 1.84282
Low 1.00 0.071
No. of Samples 141 2,936

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 600.00 600.00
Mean 80.07 72.96 45.05546
Low 2.50 0.00
No. of Samples 149 4,526

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Escherichia coli

Units: cfu/100ml Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 24196.00 24196.00
Mean 914.87 785.23 3077.84524
Low 10.00 10.00
No. of Samples 132 2,019

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: ug/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 6740.00 19600.00
Mean 40.28 30.52 1497.45629
Low 8.00 0.00
No. of Samples 149 4,046

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: ug/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 11600.00 21700.00
Mean 1141.93 1051.62 1933.93163
Low 368.00 2.00
No. of Samples 149 4,119

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: ug/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 1060.00 9700.00
Mean 107.11 150.03 420.59761
Low 6.00 0.00
No. of Samples 149 3,703

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 9.4751 10.70
Mean 7.45 7.31 0.66192
Low 6.03 0.078
No. of Samples 149 4,912

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 1.7924 31.60
Mean 0.34 0.31 1.15589
Low 0.1808 0.00
No. of Samples 141 3,479

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: umho Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 3375.55 51500.00
Mean 680.61 653.33 1737.07956
Low 374.428 0.369
No. of Samples 157 6,323

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: deg F Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 197.8659 211.586
Mean 159.49 79.47 28.03406
Low 56.048 32.00
No. of Samples 149 5,206

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 5.80 240.00
Mean 3.83 4.44 10.85021
Low 3.00 0.091
No. of Samples 8 3,199

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Water Chemistry Ratings | Tidal Portion of the Creek

Creek Conditions Ratings are based on comparing nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorophyll and dissolved oxygen to water quality guidelines or regulations. Florida law defines a maximum allowable concentration of chlorophyll a and a minimum allowable concentration of dissolved oxygen in these streams. Florida has no regulatory thresholds for nitrogen or phosphorus in tidal creeks so trends are used to rate the creeks. Learn more about these ratings and how they are calculated »

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1947
Chart Legend
  • Trend Line
  • Annual Mean
  • Threshold
Pass

Chlorophyll a

Score: Pass
Units: mg/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 0.0 0.1
Mean 0.0068 0.0079 0.01031327
Low 0.0023 0.0003
No. of Samples 12 346

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

We were unable to determine a trend for the data available.
Units: mg/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 1.6 8.9
Mean 1.0314 1.0086 1.17984139
Low 0.775 0.131
No. of Samples 12 344

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

We were unable to determine a trend for the data available.
Units: mg/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 0.3 2.2
Mean 0.2102 0.3161 0.22748887
Low 0.137 0.084
No. of Samples 12 376

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean
Pass

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Low DO saturation also may be naturally influenced by inflows from nearby wetlands or groundwater sources
Score: Pass
Units: percent (%) Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 75.5 210.0
Mean 57.92 60.53 24.93807
Low 0.00 0.00
No. of Samples 12 340

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 2.2 7.5
Mean 1.17 1.42 0.84265
Low 1.00 0.50
No. of Samples 12 281

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 120.0 280.0
Mean 55.19 51.86 36.10218
Low 25.00 7.00
No. of Samples 12 401

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Enterococcus Group Bacteria

Units: cfu/100ml Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 842.0 41,000.0
Mean 170.2 434.37 3892.76137
Low 31.00 10.00
No. of Samples 12 129

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: ug/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 656.0 945.0
Mean 138.88 26.05 107.29766
Low 8.00 0.00
No. of Samples 12 428

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: ug/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 1,420.0 3,092.0
Mean 956.11 827.59 370.43554
Low 752.00 70.00
No. of Samples 12 421

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: ug/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 212.0 1,140.0
Mean 48.79 78.98 163.04197
Low 6.00 0.00
No. of Samples 12 371

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 7.9 8.5
Mean 7.45 7.68 0.32468
Low 6.55 5.58
No. of Samples 12 1,959

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 30.4 37.5
Mean 10.96 13.76 11.42095
Low 0.306 0.00
No. of Samples 12 2,404

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: umho Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 46,077.5 55,333.0
Mean 18067.14 19383.53 16175.58588
Low 624.129 0.30
No. of Samples 12 2,001

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: deg F Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 186.0 211.6
Mean 170.64 76.61 14.60881
Low 149.0466 49.10
No. of Samples 12 1,929

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 21.0
Mean 3.98 2.72102
Low 1.30
No. of Samples 0 333

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Oysters

Because they are immobile and will tolerate a fairly wide salinity range, eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are valuable as an indicator of the relative health of aquatic ecosystems in the tidally-influenced portions of coastal creeks. Sarasota County has established an oyster monitoring program to track the location, types, and status of oyster reefs. Data from this monitoring program is shown below. Learn more about Oysters »

Loading oyster site map...
Most Recent Sarasota County Oyster Monitoring Program Data
Icon Site ID Year Dead Live Total % Live
1 PH3 2022 75 60 135 44

Impervious Features

Phillippi Creek is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Rain that falls on land that is in a natural state is absorbed and filtered by soils and vegetation as it makes it way into underground aquifers. However, in developed areas, "impervious surfaces" impede this process and contribute to polluted urban runoff entering surface waters. These surfaces include human infrastructure like roads, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots that are covered by impenetrable materials such as asphalt, concrete, brick and stone, as well as buildings and other permanent structures. Soils that have been disturbed and compacted by urban development are often impervious as well. Learn more about Impervious Features »

The Sarasota County Stormwater Environmental Utility (SEU) mapped impervious surfaces in the County in 2013. A map showing impervious surfaces can be viewed using the Water Atlas Map Viewer tool.

20% of the land area within the Phillippi Creek Basin is covered by impervious surfaces

Impervious Surface Coverage by Type

Land Use / Land Cover

Phillippi Creek is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Land use within a creek's watershed has a major effect on its water quality. In general, less development means better water quality. Land Cover/Land Use classifications categorize land in terms of its observed physical surface characteristics (e.g. upland or wetland), and also reflect the types of activity that are taking place on it (agriculture, urban/built-up, utilities, etc.). Florida uses as its standard a set of statewide classifications which were developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. Learn more about Land Use and Land Cover »

Acreage and Percentage within each Land Use / Land Cover Category for Phillippi Creek Basin
Land Use Classification 1990 1995 1999 2005 2011 2014 2017 2020 Trend
Urban & Built-up 20,77358.1% 22,10961.8% 23,05164.4% 25,70071.8% 26,06672.9% 25,76872% 26,46074% 27,12475.8% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Agriculture 6,39817.9% 6,01816.8% 4,65713% 2,4987% 2,2166.2% 2,3096.5% 1,8225.1% 1,3183.7% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Rangeland 5231.5% 3080.9% 2620.7% 1420.4% 1470.4% 3300.9% 1290.4% 1290.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Upland Forests 3,3729.4% 2,6197.3% 2,3636.6% 1,9055.3% 1,7244.8% 1,7715% 1,6184.5% 1,4394% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Water 1,1713.3% 1,3673.8% 1,6064.5% 1,8585.2% 2,0275.7% 1,8835.3% 1,9975.6% 2,0635.8% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Wetlands 2,2736.4% 1,7624.9% 1,7354.8% 1,7154.8% 1,7274.8% 1,8605.2% 1,8195.1% 1,8105.1% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Barren Land 190.1% 1060.3% 6341.8% 90% 990.3% 950.3% 1000.3% 650.2% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Transportation and Utilities 1,2443.5% 1,4814.1% 1,4644.1% 1,9435.4% 1,7674.9% 1,7554.9% 1,8265.1% 1,8235.1% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Land Use Chart