Explore general as well as scientific information about the movement, chemistry and biology of area surface and ground water environments.
The following data are summarized as seasonal average values for lake and river sampling locations located within the watershed. While these data are useful to serve as a general picture of watershed health, these data must be viewed with caution because these samples have been taken from ecologically different water resources.
Season | Total Nitrogen | Nitrate (NO3) | Total Phosphorus | Orthophosphate | Number of Sample Stations | Number of Samples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JUL-SEP 2024 | 1,734 ug/l | 557 ug/l | 1 | 3 | ||
APR-JUN 2024 | 925 ug/l | 188 ug/l | 2 | 5 | ||
JAN-MAR 2024 | 1,073 ug/l | 224 ug/l | 0.16 mg/l | 11 | 15 | |
OCT-DEC 2023 | 1,169 ug/l | 334 ug/l | 0.26 mg/l | 14 | 26 | |
JUL-SEP 2023 | 1,163 ug/l | 392 ug/l | 0.27 mg/l | 14 | 37 | |
APR-JUN 2023 | 1,158 ug/l | 349 ug/l | 0.27 mg/l | 12 | 34 | |
JAN-MAR 2023 | 979 ug/l | 281 ug/l | 5 | 11 | ||
OCT-DEC 2022 | 1,331 ug/l | 435 ug/l | 0.33 mg/l | 15 | 33 | |
JUL-SEP 2022 | 1,393 ug/l | 414 ug/l | 0.35 mg/l | 13 | 32 | |
APR-JUN 2022 | 1,361 ug/l | 235 ug/l | 0.18 mg/l | 15 | 37 | |
JAN-MAR 2022 | 943 ug/l | 198 ug/l | 0.13 mg/l | 15 | 37 | |
Five Year Seasonal Graph | ||||||
Five Year Graph of All Samples |
Season | Total Nitrogen | Nitrate (NO3) | Total Phosphorus | Orthophosphate | Number of Sample Stations | Number of Samples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAN-MAR 2024 | 1,004 ug/l | 205 ug/l | 1 | 2 | ||
OCT-DEC 2023 | 1,504 ug/l | 298 ug/l | 5 | 9 | ||
JUL-SEP 2023 | 1,051 ug/l | 442 ug/l | 5 | 11 | ||
APR-JUN 2023 | 1,306 ug/l | 224 ug/l | 5 | 13 | ||
JAN-MAR 2023 | 1,067 ug/l | 207 ug/l | 5 | 11 | ||
OCT-DEC 2022 | 1,065 ug/l | 389 ug/l | 5 | 13 | ||
JUL-SEP 2022 | 1,015 ug/l | 452 ug/l | 5 | 9 | ||
APR-JUN 2022 | 863 ug/l | 235 ug/l | 3 | 9 | ||
JAN-MAR 2022 | 1,023 ug/l | 226 ug/l | 5 | 11 | ||
Five Year Seasonal Graph | ||||||
Five Year Graph of All Samples |
Southwest Florida Water Management District calculates the Aquifer Resource Indicator (ARI) for their three groundwater regions each month. The ARI was created to provide the public with a gauge of groundwater levels in their area, so they can develop an understanding of the severity and cycles of drought and recovery. The three regions include: North (Citrus, Hernando, Lake, Levy, Marion, and Sumter counties), Central (Hillsborough, Pasco, Pinellas, and Polk counties), and South (Charlotte, DeSoto, Hardee, Highlands, Manatee, and Sarasota counties). Learn More about the Aquifer Resource Indicator >>
To determine the ARI for a region, each well is compared weekly to its respective low-normal value and the difference is calculated. The weekly differences are reduced to a monthly value for all monitoring wells within a region, and the resulting ARI value represents how far water levels in the aquifer must rise or fall to reach their respective low-normal values.
Stream level and flow data for the Myakka River Watershed. Learn More about Stream Flow »
River | Flows Whole River Range | Flows Data by Segment | Levels Whole River Range | Levels Data By Segment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Big Slough |
Average river flow is slower than it has been historically. |
Average water levels are higher than they have been historically. |
||
Deer Prairie Slough |
NO DATA Recent river flow data is unavailable. |
|
Average water levels are lower than they have been historically. |
|
Howard Creek |
Average river flow is slower than it has been historically. |
Average water levels are higher than they have been historically. |
||
Cocoplum Waterway |
Average river flow is slower than it has been historically. |
Average water levels are the same as they have been historically. |
||
Myakka River |
Average river flow is slower than it has been historically. |
Average water levels are higher than they have been historically. |
||
Coker Creek |
Average river flow is slower than it has been historically. |
Average water levels are lower than they have been historically. |
||
Long Creek |
Average river flow is slower than it has been historically. |
Average water levels are lower than they have been historically. |
||
Maple Creek |
Average river flow is slower than it has been historically. |
Average water levels are the same as they have been historically. |
||
Ogleby Creek |
Average river flow is slower than it has been historically. |
Average water levels are lower than they have been historically. |
||
Taylor Creek |
Average river flow is slower than it has been historically. |
Average water levels are lower than they have been historically. |
Source(s): Not Available
Source(s): Not Available