Caution
Rating icon - Chlorophyll a Rating icon - Total Nitrogen Rating icon - Total Phosphorous Rating icon - Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

1 out of 4 primary indicators were rated as PASS.

"Primary" are nutrient related (Chl, N, P) and bacteria (B) parameters.

All four indicators must pass for the creek to be rated as PASS.

Greyed out values indicate no data for the report year.

  • Size: 6,789 acres
  • Location: South Sarasota County
  • Discharges into: Lemon Bay

For more information, please see: Alligator Creek Sediment Management Plan (2006)

View county-wide water quality trends »

Alligator Creek

Water Chemistry Ratings

Monitoring data is analyzed to determine stream health based on State water quality standards. Official determination of impairment or attainment of the water quality standards is performed by FDEP and is based on at least three years and up to seven and a half years of data. Information on approximately 17 different parameters are collected at stream sites, but only total nitrogen, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, dissolved oxygen (percent saturation), and bacteria are assessed according to established water quality criteria mandated by the Clean Water Act. Additionally, the floral and faunal communities (SCI) are assessed at some sites to determine whether waters support a healthy aquatic community.

The "pass/fail" conditions presented here do not indicate impairment as determined by the official Florida Department of Environmental Protection Impaired Waters Rule assessment but, rather, give an indication of stream condition in a particular year in relation to the set regulatory numeric limits. Streams receive an annual "PASS" rating for each parameter if the mean value is below the regulatory value and a "FAIL" rating if the mean value exceeds the regulatory value. Not all water quality parameters have an established numeric criterion, so only some of the graphs below show the regulatory limit, represented by a horizontal red line.

Chart Legend
  • Monthly Average
  • Threshold
  • Annual Mean

The graphs here illustrate results over the past five years. Data from sites monitored within a single waterbody identification basin (WBID) are combined to determine water quality status for each WBID, and the annual geometric mean of sample results is indicated on the graph for the most recent year. The table to the left of the graph gives the annual and historic range of values for the indicator.

Click the graph to view a larger image and to download the full dataset.

Freshwater Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 2030A
  • 2030B

Chlorophyll a

Units: µg/l Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 467.00 2651.00
Mean 27.6277 43.0149 115.06153
Low 0.465 0.00
No. of Samples 62 1,551
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 20.00 µg/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 7.12 44.407
Mean 1.9017 1.9791 2.15415074
Low 0.319 0.169
No. of Samples 74 1,154
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 1.65 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.581 1.60
Mean 0.241 0.1472 0.13521843
Low 0.027 0.008
No. of Samples 61 1,371
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 0.49 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Units: percent (%) Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 210.48 933.00
Mean 41.89 44.86 49.86882
Low 0.1585 0.00
No. of Samples 116 1,535
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 38.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 10.10 17.30
Mean 4.06 3.72 2.92029
Low 1.00 0.50
No. of Samples 60 1,270
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 320.00 500.00
Mean 137.55 112.29 70.92434
Low 20.00 15.00
No. of Samples 61 1,151
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Escherichia coli

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 2755.00 12033.00
Mean 116.61 105.33 682.78957
Low 10.00 9.70
No. of Samples 57 757
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 1.69 2.43
Mean 0.09 0.03 0.37531435
Low 0.008 0.00
No. of Samples 61 1,140
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 7.10 44.40
Mean 2.06 2.14 2.01211827
Low 0.472 0.14
No. of Samples 67 1,358
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.164 1.25
Mean 0.03 0.02 0.09420989
Low 0.003 0.00
No. of Samples 67 1,091
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 9.48 9.94
Mean 7.84 7.5 0.67909
Low 6.42 0.40
No. of Samples 116 3,459
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 4.98 26.3411
Mean 0.2 0.27 1.01407
Low 0.00 0.00
No. of Samples 117 2,991
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 8793.54 40542.80
Mean 375.34 563.89 1630.1203
Low 0.06 0.00
No. of Samples 116 3,133
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 201.5744 201.5744
Mean 162.08 86.07 42.23475
Low 65.7842 32.00
No. of Samples 116 3,063
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 45.00 100.00
Mean 45.0 8.63 16.30198
Low 45.00 0.52
No. of Samples 1 661
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Tidal Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 2021
  • 2030
Pass

Chlorophyll a

Score: Pass
Units: µg/l Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 142.0 4,333.0
Mean 10.1456 11.6685 186.66591
Low 1.07 0.379
No. of Samples 48 1,461
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 11.00 ug/l
  • Annual Mean
Pass

Nitrogen, Total

No trend was observed after performing a trend analysis.
Score: Pass
Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 2.4 54.6
Mean 1.1611 1.3902 1.94424982
Low 0.586 0.13
No. of Samples 48 1,162
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Pass

Phosphorus, Total

No trend was observed after performing a trend analysis.
Score: Pass
Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.8 4.8
Mean 0.2909 0.3576 0.45392147
Low 0.115 0.031
No. of Samples 48 1,395
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Caution

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Score: Caution
Units: percent (%) Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 138.0 233.2
Mean 44.2 38.55 32.00357
Low 5.64 0.0684
No. of Samples 46 1,376
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 56.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 8.9 20.0
Mean 2.66 1.83 2.13244
Low 1.00 0.50
No. of Samples 48 1,345
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 160.0 1,000.0
Mean 87.27 81.51 42.29972
Low 40.00 5.00
No. of Samples 48 1,348
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Enterococcus Group Bacteria

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 1,467.0 24,196.0
Mean 207.14 361.68 2253.00175
Low 10.00 10.00
No. of Samples 24 349
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 1.1 2.2
Mean 0.1 0.06 0.37263787
Low 0.008 0.00
No. of Samples 48 1,492
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 2.3 54.6
Mean 1.03 1.26 1.85793802
Low 0.519 0.12
No. of Samples 48 1,426
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.5 4.6
Mean 0.08 0.09 0.26740519
Low 0.012 0.00
No. of Samples 48 1,339
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 7.9 9.3
Mean 7.44 7.35 0.28667
Low 6.96 0.10
No. of Samples 46 6,403
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 37.7 59.6
Mean 3.12 2.18 11.48192
Low 0.01 0.00
No. of Samples 46 6,123
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 55,940.8 63,430.0
Mean 5571.87 3492.1 13752.40245
Low 26.44 0.823
No. of Samples 46 6,192
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 197.9 207.4
Mean 174.74 80.58 27.99379
Low 133.8908 46.40
No. of Samples 46 6,189
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 85.0
Mean 3.29 5.82824
Low 0.50
No. of Samples 0 861
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Oysters

Because they are immobile and will tolerate a fairly wide salinity range, eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are valuable as an indicator of the relative health of aquatic ecosystems in the tidally-influenced portions of coastal creeks. Sarasota County has established an oyster monitoring program to track the location, types, and status of oyster reefs. Data from this monitoring program is shown below. Learn more about Oysters »

Loading oyster site map...
Most Recent Sarasota County Oyster Monitoring Program Data
Icon Site ID Year Dead Live Total % Live
1 AL2 2025 50 102 152 67

Impervious Features

Alligator Creek is located within the Lemon Bay Watershed. View details about the Lemon Bay Watershed »

Rain that falls on land that is in a natural state is absorbed and filtered by soils and vegetation as it makes it way into underground aquifers. However, in developed areas, "impervious surfaces" impede this process and contribute to polluted urban runoff entering surface waters. These surfaces include human infrastructure like roads, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots that are covered by impenetrable materials such as asphalt, concrete, brick and stone, as well as buildings and other permanent structures. Soils that have been disturbed and compacted by urban development are often impervious as well. Learn more about Impervious Features »

The Sarasota County Stormwater Environmental Utility (SEU) mapped impervious surfaces in the County in 2013. A map showing impervious surfaces can be viewed using the Water Atlas Map Viewer tool.

23% of the land area within the Alligator Creek Basin is covered by impervious surfaces

Impervious Surface Coverage by Type

Land Use / Land Cover

Alligator Creek is located within the Lemon Bay Watershed. View details about the Lemon Bay Watershed »

Land use within a creek's watershed has a major effect on its water quality. In general, less development means better water quality. Land Cover/Land Use classifications categorize land in terms of its observed physical surface characteristics (e.g. upland or wetland), and also reflect the types of activity that are taking place on it (agriculture, urban/built-up, utilities, etc.). Florida uses as its standard a set of statewide classifications which were developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. Learn more about Land Use and Land Cover »

Acreage and Percentage within each Land Use / Land Cover Category for Alligator Creek Basin
Land Use Classification 1990 1995 1999 2005 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 Trend
Urban & Built-up 3,99058.8% 4,41565% 5,06674.6% 4,72069.5% 4,81270.9% 4,81270.9% 4,92772.6% 4,91472.4% 4,93672.7% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Agriculture 731.1% 620.9% 711% 2824.2% 640.9% 640.9% 420.6% 420.6% 420.6% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Rangeland 5508.1% 74010.9% 951.4% 2233.3% 2944.3% 2944.3% 2002.9% 2002.9% 1992.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Upland Forests 82112.1% 2303.4% 1902.8% 1812.7% 1732.6% 1732.6% 1622.4% 1622.4% 1402.1% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Water 3615.3% 6109% 5748.4% 4847.1% 5287.8% 5287.8% 5488.1% 5518.1% 5558.2% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Wetlands 73710.9% 4596.8% 5187.6% 6199.1% 6259.2% 6259.2% 6189.1% 6189.1% 6169.1% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Barren Land 220.3% 00% 20% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Transportation and Utilities 2343.4% 2724% 2754% 2804.1% 2934.3% 2934.3% 2934.3% 3034.5% 3024.5% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Land Use Chart