Pass
Rating icon - Chlorophyll a Rating icon - Total Nitrogen Rating icon - Total Phosphorous Rating icon - Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

4 out of 4 primary indicators were rated as PASS.

"Primary" are nutrient related (Chl, N, P) and bacteria (B) parameters.

All four indicators must pass for the creek to be rated as PASS.

Greyed out values indicate no data for the report year.

  • Size: 3,342 acres
  • Location: Central Sarasota County
  • Discharges into: Roberts Bay (Venice)

For more information, please see: Hatchett Creek Flood Study Update (2001)

View county-wide water quality trends »

Hatchett Creek

Water Chemistry Ratings

Monitoring data is analyzed to determine stream health based on State water quality standards. Official determination of impairment or attainment of the water quality standards is performed by FDEP and is based on at least three years and up to seven and a half years of data. Information on approximately 17 different parameters are collected at stream sites, but only total nitrogen, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, dissolved oxygen (percent saturation), and bacteria are assessed according to established water quality criteria mandated by the Clean Water Act. Additionally, the floral and faunal communities (SCI) are assessed at some sites to determine whether waters support a healthy aquatic community.

The "pass/fail" conditions presented here do not indicate impairment as determined by the official Florida Department of Environmental Protection Impaired Waters Rule assessment but, rather, give an indication of stream condition in a particular year in relation to the set regulatory numeric limits. Streams receive an annual "PASS" rating for each parameter if the mean value is below the regulatory value and a "FAIL" rating if the mean value exceeds the regulatory value. Not all water quality parameters have an established numeric criterion, so only some of the graphs below show the regulatory limit, represented by a horizontal red line.

Chart Legend
  • Monthly Average
  • Threshold
  • Annual Mean

The graphs here illustrate results over the past five years. Data from sites monitored within a single waterbody identification basin (WBID) are combined to determine water quality status for each WBID, and the annual geometric mean of sample results is indicated on the graph for the most recent year. The table to the left of the graph gives the annual and historic range of values for the indicator.

Click the graph to view a larger image and to download the full dataset.

Freshwater Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 2015A

Chlorophyll a

Units: µg/l Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 16.20 290.00
Mean 4.4342 4.5814 23.93635
Low 1.14 0.25
No. of Samples 12 355
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 20.00 µg/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 2.428 3.087
Mean 1.1912 1.0213 0.38131512
Low 0.809 0.34
No. of Samples 12 288
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 1.65 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.218 0.997
Mean 0.1185 0.1678 0.1480908
Low 0.063 0.049
No. of Samples 12 356
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 0.49 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Units: percent (%) Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 116.82 184.40
Mean 62.24 48.6 28.062
Low 15.26 0.00
No. of Samples 12 417
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 38.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 2.84 13.70
Mean 1.4 1.06 1.51343
Low 1.00 0.50
No. of Samples 12 318
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 80.00 250.00
Mean 56.32 70.81 23.16659
Low 40.00 25.00
No. of Samples 12 399
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Escherichia coli

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 8664.00 17329.00
Mean 688.04 686.16 2297.24872
Low 110.00 13.40
No. of Samples 12 172
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.155 0.791
Mean 0.05 0.02 0.09940855
Low 0.021 0.00
No. of Samples 12 404
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 2.23 9.947
Mean 1.05 0.86 0.72797185
Low 0.66 0.17
No. of Samples 12 390
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.211 1.08
Mean 0.1 0.11 0.15451073
Low 0.01 0.00
No. of Samples 12 360
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 7.92 9.70
Mean 7.65 7.52 0.27592
Low 7.31 6.17
No. of Samples 12 494
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 3.85 29.9166
Mean 0.69 0.67 2.50695
Low 0.16 0.00
No. of Samples 12 399
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 6929.20 45412.90
Mean 1368.28 1111.22 4220.49809
Low 325.36 0.904
No. of Samples 12 490
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 185.2448 200.894
Mean 167.6 85.54 39.07588
Low 136.1912 48.20
No. of Samples 12 378
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 30.00
Mean 2.32 3.16681
Low 0.21
No. of Samples 0 312
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Tidal Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 2015

Chlorophyll a

Units: µg/l Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 279.0
Mean 6.0883 23.55234
Low 0.56
No. of Samples 0 146
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 11.00 ug/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

We were unable to determine a trend for the data available.
Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 3.3
Mean 0.8595 0.38873771
Low 0.298
No. of Samples 0 128
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

We were unable to determine a trend for the data available.
Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 3.2
Mean 0.3312 0.40862604
Low 0.048
No. of Samples 0 156
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Units: percent (%) Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 134.3
Mean 53.34 25.14829
Low 7.40
No. of Samples 0 253
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 56.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 28.5
Mean 1.52 4.24441
Low 0.50
No. of Samples 0 97
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 140.0
Mean 45.64 25.03433
Low 2.60
No. of Samples 0 211
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Enterococcus Group Bacteria

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 24,196.0
Mean 747.13 5890.97935
Low 10.00
No. of Samples 0 49
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.8
Mean 0.02 0.1433849
Low 0.0002
No. of Samples 0 204
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 3.0
Mean 0.79 0.36874231
Low 0.05
No. of Samples 0 197
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.3
Mean 0.06 0.09491195
Low 0.00
No. of Samples 0 161
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 8.9
Mean 7.49 0.35132
Low 6.47
No. of Samples 0 287
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 36.8
Mean 16.41 11.02196
Low 0.42
No. of Samples 0 263
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 55,648.0
Mean 18981.94 16459.66525
Low 0.68
No. of Samples 0 335
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 93.2
Mean 76.08 8.35639
Low 53.60
No. of Samples 0 233
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 150.0
Mean 3.26 14.3441
Low 0.89
No. of Samples 0 223
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Oysters

Because they are immobile and will tolerate a fairly wide salinity range, eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are valuable as an indicator of the relative health of aquatic ecosystems in the tidally-influenced portions of coastal creeks. Sarasota County has established an oyster monitoring program to track the location, types, and status of oyster reefs. Data from this monitoring program is shown below. Learn more about Oysters »

Loading oyster site map...
Most Recent Sarasota County Oyster Monitoring Program Data
Icon Site ID Year Dead Live Total % Live

Impervious Features

Hatchett Creek is located within the Dona and Roberts Bay Watershed. View details about the Dona and Roberts Bay Watershed »

Rain that falls on land that is in a natural state is absorbed and filtered by soils and vegetation as it makes it way into underground aquifers. However, in developed areas, "impervious surfaces" impede this process and contribute to polluted urban runoff entering surface waters. These surfaces include human infrastructure like roads, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots that are covered by impenetrable materials such as asphalt, concrete, brick and stone, as well as buildings and other permanent structures. Soils that have been disturbed and compacted by urban development are often impervious as well. Learn more about Impervious Features »

The Sarasota County Stormwater Environmental Utility (SEU) mapped impervious surfaces in the County in 2013. A map showing impervious surfaces can be viewed using the Water Atlas Map Viewer tool.

28% of the land area within the Hatchett Creek Basin is covered by impervious surfaces

Impervious Surface Coverage by Type

Land Use / Land Cover

Hatchett Creek is located within the Dona and Roberts Bay Watershed. View details about the Dona and Roberts Bay Watershed »

Land use within a creek's watershed has a major effect on its water quality. In general, less development means better water quality. Land Cover/Land Use classifications categorize land in terms of its observed physical surface characteristics (e.g. upland or wetland), and also reflect the types of activity that are taking place on it (agriculture, urban/built-up, utilities, etc.). Florida uses as its standard a set of statewide classifications which were developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. Learn more about Land Use and Land Cover »

Acreage and Percentage within each Land Use / Land Cover Category for Hatchett Creek Basin
Land Use Classification 1990 1995 1999 2005 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 Trend
Urban & Built-up 1,58747.5% 1,97959.2% 2,14264.1% 2,40772% 2,42572.6% 2,42072.4% 2,45973.6% 2,45673.5% 2,45573.5% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Agriculture 1143.4% 1013% 1013% 692.1% 150.5% 150.5% 00% 70.2% 70.2% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Rangeland 2938.8% 521.6% 290.9% 70.2% 60.2% 60.2% 70.2% 40.1% 40.1% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Upland Forests 91827.5% 70321% 50615.1% 2206.6% 2226.7% 2286.8% 2096.2% 2076.2% 2076.2% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Water 712.1% 1654.9% 1785.3% 2146.4% 2206.6% 2206.6% 2236.7% 2246.7% 2266.8% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Wetlands 2768.3% 2337% 2778.3% 2838.5% 2978.9% 2978.9% 2978.9% 2978.9% 2958.8% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Barren Land 100.3% 00% 00% 00% 90.3% 90.3% 00% 00% 00% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Transportation and Utilities 732.2% 1093.3% 1093.3% 1424.2% 1474.4% 1474.4% 1484.4% 1484.4% 1484.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Land Use Chart