Caution
Rating icon - Chlorophyll a Rating icon - Total Nitrogen Rating icon - Total Phosphorous Rating icon - Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

3 out of 4 primary indicators were rated as PASS.

"Primary" are nutrient related (Chl, N, P) and bacteria (B) parameters.

All four indicators must pass for the creek to be rated as PASS.

Greyed out values indicate no data for the report year.

  • Size: 284 acres
  • Location: Central Sarasota County
  • Discharges into: Little Sarasota Bay

For more information, please see: Little Sarasota Bay Water Quality Management Plan (2012)

View county-wide water quality trends »

Clower Creek

Water Chemistry Ratings

Monitoring data is analyzed to determine stream health based on State water quality standards. Official determination of impairment or attainment of the water quality standards is performed by FDEP and is based on at least three years and up to seven and a half years of data. Information on approximately 17 different parameters are collected at stream sites, but only total nitrogen, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, dissolved oxygen (percent saturation), and bacteria are assessed according to established water quality criteria mandated by the Clean Water Act. Additionally, the floral and faunal communities (SCI) are assessed at some sites to determine whether waters support a healthy aquatic community.

The "pass/fail" conditions presented here do not indicate impairment as determined by the official Florida Department of Environmental Protection Impaired Waters Rule assessment but, rather, give an indication of stream condition in a particular year in relation to the set regulatory numeric limits. Streams receive an annual "PASS" rating for each parameter if the mean value is below the regulatory value and a "FAIL" rating if the mean value exceeds the regulatory value. Not all water quality parameters have an established numeric criterion, so only some of the graphs below show the regulatory limit, represented by a horizontal red line.

Chart Legend
  • Monthly Average
  • Threshold
  • Annual Mean

The graphs here illustrate results over the past five years. Data from sites monitored within a single waterbody identification basin (WBID) are combined to determine water quality status for each WBID, and the annual geometric mean of sample results is indicated on the graph for the most recent year. The table to the left of the graph gives the annual and historic range of values for the indicator.

Click the graph to view a larger image and to download the full dataset.

Freshwater Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1975A
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Tidal Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1975A
Pass

Chlorophyll a

Score: Pass
Units: µg/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 28.0 150.0
Mean 6.1326 4.0288 12.09604
Low 0.969 0.10
No. of Samples 12 417
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 11.00 ug/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

We were unable to determine a trend for the data available.
Units: mg/L Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 2.4 14.1
Mean 1.261 1.2935 1.15801007
Low 0.83 0.0022
No. of Samples 12 381
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

We were unable to determine a trend for the data available.
Units: mg/L Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 1.7 3.1
Mean 0.2391 0.2874 0.42386233
Low 0.102 0.039
No. of Samples 12 420
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Caution

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Score: Caution
Units: percent (%) Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 82.9 150.5
Mean 42.66 41.1 23.69228
Low 4.8156 2.20
No. of Samples 12 467
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 56.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 4.0 7.0
Mean 1.24 1.17 0.81598
Low 1.00 0.23
No. of Samples 12 322
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 120.0 300.0
Mean 84.22 88.9 42.50207
Low 60.00 10.00
No. of Samples 12 489
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 0.5 7.0
Mean 0.12 0.08 0.37424362
Low 0.008 0.00
No. of Samples 12 484
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 2.2 14.0
Mean 1.14 1.13 0.94626789
Low 0.769 0.17
No. of Samples 12 468
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 0.3 2.9
Mean 0.1 0.15 0.31792001
Low 0.019 0.00
No. of Samples 12 432
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 7.7 8.5
Mean 7.34 7.19 0.31754
Low 7.0727 4.70
No. of Samples 12 523
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 22.6 35.3
Mean 0.47 0.94 9.00731
Low 0.204 0.00
No. of Samples 12 478
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 35,318.1 52,344.0
Mean 933.71 1243.53 11892.06803
Low 421.37 0.342
No. of Samples 12 551
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 183.2 185.1
Mean 168.81 78.87 26.70063
Low 148.2544 49.784
No. of Samples 12 470
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2022
Historical
period of record
High 117.0
Mean 7.68 14.15312
Low 1.20
No. of Samples 0 396
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Oysters

Because they are immobile and will tolerate a fairly wide salinity range, eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are valuable as an indicator of the relative health of aquatic ecosystems in the tidally-influenced portions of coastal creeks. Sarasota County has established an oyster monitoring program to track the location, types, and status of oyster reefs. Data from this monitoring program is shown below. Learn more about Oysters »

Loading oyster site map...
Most Recent Sarasota County Oyster Monitoring Program Data
Icon Site ID Year Dead Live Total % Live

Impervious Features

Clower Creek is located within the Little Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Little Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Rain that falls on land that is in a natural state is absorbed and filtered by soils and vegetation as it makes it way into underground aquifers. However, in developed areas, "impervious surfaces" impede this process and contribute to polluted urban runoff entering surface waters. These surfaces include human infrastructure like roads, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots that are covered by impenetrable materials such as asphalt, concrete, brick and stone, as well as buildings and other permanent structures. Soils that have been disturbed and compacted by urban development are often impervious as well. Learn more about Impervious Features »

The Sarasota County Stormwater Environmental Utility (SEU) mapped impervious surfaces in the County in 2013. A map showing impervious surfaces can be viewed using the Water Atlas Map Viewer tool.

53% of the land area within the Clower Creek Basin is covered by impervious surfaces

Impervious Surface Coverage by Type

Land Use / Land Cover

Clower Creek is located within the Little Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Little Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Land use within a creek's watershed has a major effect on its water quality. In general, less development means better water quality. Land Cover/Land Use classifications categorize land in terms of its observed physical surface characteristics (e.g. upland or wetland), and also reflect the types of activity that are taking place on it (agriculture, urban/built-up, utilities, etc.). Florida uses as its standard a set of statewide classifications which were developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. Learn more about Land Use and Land Cover »

Acreage and Percentage within each Land Use / Land Cover Category for Clower Creek Basin
Land Use Classification 1990 1995 1999 2005 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 Trend
Urban & Built-up 22278% 22177.8% 22077.4% 21976.9% 21976.9% 21976.9% 21976.9% 21976.9% 21976.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Rangeland 00% 10.3% 10.3% 10.3% 10.3% 10.3% 10.3% 10.3% 10.3% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Upland Forests 3010.6% 3010.6% 3010.6% 3010.6% 3010.6% 3010.6% 3010.6% 3010.6% 3010.6% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Water 134.4% 155.1% 145% 145% 145% 145% 145% 145% 145% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Wetlands 10.2% 00% 10.5% 10.5% 10.5% 10.5% 10.5% 10.5% 10.5% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Barren Land 51.6% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Transportation and Utilities 155.2% 176.1% 176.1% 196.7% 196.7% 196.7% 196.7% 196.7% 196.7% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Land Use Chart