Pass
Rating icon - Chlorophyll a Rating icon - Total Nitrogen Rating icon - Total Phosphorous Rating icon - Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

4 out of 4 primary indicators were rated as PASS.

"Primary" are nutrient related (Chl, N, P) and bacteria (B) parameters.

All four indicators must pass for the creek to be rated as PASS.

Greyed out values indicate no data for the report year.

  • Size: 47,518 acres
  • Location: North and central Sarasota County, south Manatee County
  • Discharges into: Dona Bay

For more information, please see: Cow Pen Slough Basin Master Plan (USDA Report, 1997)

View county-wide water quality trends »

Cow Pen Slough

Water Chemistry Ratings

Monitoring data is analyzed to determine stream health based on State water quality standards. Official determination of impairment or attainment of the water quality standards is performed by FDEP and is based on at least three years and up to seven and a half years of data. Information on approximately 17 different parameters are collected at stream sites, but only total nitrogen, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, dissolved oxygen (percent saturation), and bacteria are assessed according to established water quality criteria mandated by the Clean Water Act. Additionally, the floral and faunal communities (SCI) are assessed at some sites to determine whether waters support a healthy aquatic community.

The "pass/fail" conditions presented here do not indicate impairment as determined by the official Florida Department of Environmental Protection Impaired Waters Rule assessment but, rather, give an indication of stream condition in a particular year in relation to the set regulatory numeric limits. Streams receive an annual "PASS" rating for each parameter if the mean value is below the regulatory value and a "FAIL" rating if the mean value exceeds the regulatory value. Not all water quality parameters have an established numeric criterion, so only some of the graphs below show the regulatory limit, represented by a horizontal red line.

Chart Legend
  • Monthly Average
  • Threshold
  • Annual Mean

The graphs here illustrate results over the past five years. Data from sites monitored within a single waterbody identification basin (WBID) are combined to determine water quality status for each WBID, and the annual geometric mean of sample results is indicated on the graph for the most recent year. The table to the left of the graph gives the annual and historic range of values for the indicator.

Click the graph to view a larger image and to download the full dataset.

Freshwater Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1924
  • 1924B
  • 1987
  • 1994
  • 1994A
  • 1996
  • 2004

Chlorophyll a

Units: µg/l Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 73.30 243.00
Mean 6.8765 9.3385 18.84781
Low 1.01 0.568
No. of Samples 57 800
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 20.00 µg/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 2.027 2.73
Mean 1.2045 1.0041 0.43119496
Low 0.605 0.15
No. of Samples 21 434
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 1.65 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 0.453 2.30
Mean 0.1502 0.1778 0.17608331
Low 0.016 0.01
No. of Samples 30 809
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 0.49 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Units: percent (%) Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 125.70 227.16
Mean 41.16 68.38 31.54099
Low 1.80 1.80
No. of Samples 51 1,031
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 38.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 6.68 13.90
Mean 1.49 1.6 1.5308
Low 1.00 0.00
No. of Samples 57 792
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 400.00 650.00
Mean 112.58 96.08 88.7255
Low 40.00 10.00
No. of Samples 57 363
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Escherichia coli

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 631.00 631.00
Mean 23.3 26.59 79.82428
Low 10.00 10.00
No. of Samples 45 95
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 0.164 0.605
Mean 0.13 0.02 0.09218836
Low 0.104 0.00
No. of Samples 6 868
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 2.77 8.40
Mean 1.14 1.02 0.46608463
Low 0.474 0.00
No. of Samples 57 931
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 0.327 0.455
Mean 0.07 0.02 0.0586062
Low 0.01 0.00
No. of Samples 21 766
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 8.92 22.31
Mean 7.46 7.58 0.44091
Low 6.44 5.80
No. of Samples 108 4,202
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 27.50 76.50
Mean 0.54 19.23 16.22614
Low 0.10 0.00
No. of Samples 42 3,806
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 42341.60 59844.40
Mean 224.02 16354.52 18899.75188
Low 0.10 0.10
No. of Samples 51 4,149
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 211.586 211.586
Mean 84.07 77.52 8.78273
Low 57.668 47.372
No. of Samples 51 3,890
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 48.00
Mean 2.96 3.26833
Low 0.40
No. of Samples 0 926
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Tidal Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1924A
  • 1994B

Chlorophyll a

Units: µg/l Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 16.7
Mean 10.4029 3.59453
Low 4.01
No. of Samples 0 15
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 11.00 ug/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 2.2
Mean 1.0972 0.44363338
Low 0.16
No. of Samples 0 42
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 0.6
Mean 0.1913 0.11036761
Low 0.043
No. of Samples 0 39
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Units: percent (%) Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 122.5
Mean 73.4 14.47615
Low 48.1012
No. of Samples 0 128
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 56.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 1.2
Mean 1.2
Low 1.20
No. of Samples 0 1
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 300.0
Mean 72.04 68.50301
Low 10.00
No. of Samples 0 112
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 0.2
Mean 0.0 0.02760433
Low 0.00
No. of Samples 0 85
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 2.2
Mean 1.03 0.43297307
Low 0.05
No. of Samples 0 75
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 0.3
Mean 0.05 0.06663103
Low 0.00
No. of Samples 0 45
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 8.6
Mean 7.61 0.3315
Low 6.80
No. of Samples 0 160
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 33.5
Mean 11.59 8.63974
Low 0.00
No. of Samples 0 77
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 49,100.0 51,500.0
Mean 9505.9 9717.57 18849.54543
Low 226.00 144.00
No. of Samples 360 1,134
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 92.8 93.2
Mean 78.59 78.66 7.45306
Low 58.82 51.80
No. of Samples 358 1,051
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2018
Historical
period of record
High 11.0
Mean 2.82 1.74921
Low 1.00
No. of Samples 0 109
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Oysters

Because they are immobile and will tolerate a fairly wide salinity range, eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are valuable as an indicator of the relative health of aquatic ecosystems in the tidally-influenced portions of coastal creeks. Sarasota County has established an oyster monitoring program to track the location, types, and status of oyster reefs. Data from this monitoring program is shown below. Learn more about Oysters »

Loading oyster site map...
Most Recent Sarasota County Oyster Monitoring Program Data
Icon Site ID Year Dead Live Total % Live
1 SKC4 2017 143 16 159 10

Impervious Features

Cow Pen Slough is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Rain that falls on land that is in a natural state is absorbed and filtered by soils and vegetation as it makes it way into underground aquifers. However, in developed areas, "impervious surfaces" impede this process and contribute to polluted urban runoff entering surface waters. These surfaces include human infrastructure like roads, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots that are covered by impenetrable materials such as asphalt, concrete, brick and stone, as well as buildings and other permanent structures. Soils that have been disturbed and compacted by urban development are often impervious as well. Learn more about Impervious Features »

The Sarasota County Stormwater Environmental Utility (SEU) mapped impervious surfaces in the County in 2013. A map showing impervious surfaces can be viewed using the Water Atlas Map Viewer tool.

2% of the land area within the Cow Pen Slough Basin is covered by impervious surfaces

Impervious Surface Coverage by Type

Land Use / Land Cover

Cow Pen Slough is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Land use within a creek's watershed has a major effect on its water quality. In general, less development means better water quality. Land Cover/Land Use classifications categorize land in terms of its observed physical surface characteristics (e.g. upland or wetland), and also reflect the types of activity that are taking place on it (agriculture, urban/built-up, utilities, etc.). Florida uses as its standard a set of statewide classifications which were developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. Learn more about Land Use and Land Cover »

Acreage and Percentage within each Land Use / Land Cover Category for Cow Pen Slough Basin
Land Use Classification 1990 1995 1999 2005 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 Trend
Urban & Built-up 4,5089.5% 6,03812.7% 8,97518.9% 11,00123.2% 11,73024.7% 11,97425.2% 12,40026.1% 13,13127.6% 14,08629.6% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Agriculture 13,32028% 14,16429.8% 14,11229.7% 14,34730.2% 13,51228.4% 13,22727.8% 13,18427.7% 12,67726.7% 11,85324.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Rangeland 7,04114.8% 6,16813% 4,0568.5% 2,4485.2% 2,3074.9% 2,4885.2% 2,0504.3% 1,7573.7% 1,6823.5% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Upland Forests 11,44524.1% 10,05921.2% 8,50317.9% 7,48315.7% 7,37615.5% 7,30915.4% 7,13115% 6,79114.3% 6,58813.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Water 8161.7% 1,3452.8% 1,5213.2% 1,6443.5% 1,7633.7% 1,8173.8% 1,9414.1% 1,9764.2% 2,1984.6% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Wetlands 10,03521.1% 9,31019.6% 9,36719.7% 9,47119.9% 9,50720% 9,39719.8% 9,44119.9% 9,82620.7% 9,71620.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Barren Land 160% 50% 20% 490.1% 1100.2% 770.2% 820.2% 180% 450.1% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Transportation and Utilities 3370.7% 4300.9% 9822.1% 1,0752.3% 1,2132.6% 1,2302.6% 1,2882.7% 1,3422.8% 1,3552.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Land Use Chart