Caution
Rating icon - Chlorophyll a Rating icon - Total Nitrogen Rating icon - Total Phosphorous Rating icon - Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

2 out of 4 primary indicators were rated as PASS.

"Primary" are nutrient related (Chl, N, P) and bacteria (B) parameters.

All four indicators must pass for the creek to be rated as PASS.

Greyed out values indicate no data for the report year.

  • Size: 2,406 acres
  • Location: North Sarasota County
  • Discharges into: Sarasota Bay

For more information, please see: Sarasota Bay Water Quality Management Plan (2012)

View county-wide water quality trends »

Hudson Bayou

Water Chemistry Ratings

Monitoring data is analyzed to determine stream health based on State water quality standards. Official determination of impairment or attainment of the water quality standards is performed by FDEP and is based on at least three years and up to seven and a half years of data. Information on approximately 17 different parameters are collected at stream sites, but only total nitrogen, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, dissolved oxygen (percent saturation), and bacteria are assessed according to established water quality criteria mandated by the Clean Water Act. Additionally, the floral and faunal communities (SCI) are assessed at some sites to determine whether waters support a healthy aquatic community.

The "pass/fail" conditions presented here do not indicate impairment as determined by the official Florida Department of Environmental Protection Impaired Waters Rule assessment but, rather, give an indication of stream condition in a particular year in relation to the set regulatory numeric limits. Streams receive an annual "PASS" rating for each parameter if the mean value is below the regulatory value and a "FAIL" rating if the mean value exceeds the regulatory value. Not all water quality parameters have an established numeric criterion, so only some of the graphs below show the regulatory limit, represented by a horizontal red line.

Chart Legend
  • Monthly Average
  • Threshold
  • Annual Mean

The graphs here illustrate results over the past five years. Data from sites monitored within a single waterbody identification basin (WBID) are combined to determine water quality status for each WBID, and the annual geometric mean of sample results is indicated on the graph for the most recent year. The table to the left of the graph gives the annual and historic range of values for the indicator.

Click the graph to view a larger image and to download the full dataset.

Freshwater Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1953A

Chlorophyll a

Units: µg/l Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 15.00 37.80
Mean 1.542 1.4793 4.09568
Low 0.25 0.25
No. of Samples 72 229
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 20.00 µg/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 1.817 1.817
Mean 0.9117 0.8041 0.30311992
Low 0.661 0.082
No. of Samples 24 137
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 1.65 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 4.05 4.05
Mean 0.5366 0.4739 0.46893858
Low 0.203 0.15
No. of Samples 72 236
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 0.49 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Units: percent (%) Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 144.70 144.70
Mean 54.19 54.61 34.61429
Low 4.40 4.20
No. of Samples 80 284
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 38.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 9.01 9.01
Mean 1.24 1.01 1.24396
Low 0.50 0.50
No. of Samples 72 217
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 65.00
Mean 43.6 14.68181
Low 20.00
No. of Samples 0 10
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 0.34 0.587
Mean 0.08 0.1 0.11708216
Low 0.024 0.0004
No. of Samples 72 234
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 1.57 1.74
Mean 0.75 0.69 0.29579868
Low 0.46 0.00
No. of Samples 72 235
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 0.387 0.681
Mean 0.1 0.1 0.15414587
Low 0.008 0.004
No. of Samples 72 235
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 7.85 9.10
Mean 7.66 7.64 0.33684
Low 7.23 6.64
No. of Samples 30 194
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 0.51 7.00
Mean 0.36 0.36 0.5673
Low 0.21 0.04
No. of Samples 30 167
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 1035.00 54000.00
Mean 739.0 904.93 14163.68306
Low 436.00 0.445
No. of Samples 30 191
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 82.094 91.40
Mean 73.23 72.42 8.04366
Low 65.75 53.87
No. of Samples 20 165
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 10.50 38.00
Mean 3.08 3.24 2.79089
Low 1.26 1.00
No. of Samples 72 235
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Tidal Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1951
  • 1953
Pass

Chlorophyll a

Score: Pass
Units: µg/l Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 14.5 97.2
Mean 1.2884 3.1895 9.76926
Low 0.25 0.25
No. of Samples 36 145
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 11.00 ug/l
  • Annual Mean
Pass

Nitrogen, Total

No trend was observed after performing a trend analysis.
Score: Pass
Units: mg/L Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 1.5 1.9
Mean 0.9129 0.8611 0.30365489
Low 0.648 0.34
No. of Samples 12 125
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Caution

Phosphorus, Total

Trend analysis shows a weak increasing trend.
Score: Caution
Units: mg/L Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 1.3 1.3
Mean 0.5683 0.337 0.24695159
Low 0.222 0.05
No. of Samples 36 185
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Caution

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Score: Caution
Units: percent (%) Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 69.4 128.7
Mean 31.88 39.04 26.11442
Low 4.00 0.70
No. of Samples 40 281
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 56.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 2.8 5.4
Mean 1.09 1.69 1.06992
Low 0.50 0.50
No. of Samples 36 127
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 125.0
Mean 23.7 22.74227
Low 5.00
No. of Samples 0 121
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 0.2 0.9
Mean 0.07 0.02 0.13128757
Low 0.039 0.00
No. of Samples 36 232
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 1.2 1.9
Mean 0.59 0.72 0.30118157
Low 0.337 0.16
No. of Samples 36 231
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 0.6 0.7
Mean 0.29 0.09 0.16174015
Low 0.168 0.00
No. of Samples 36 193
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 7.6 8.4
Mean 7.13 7.64 0.45081
Low 6.40 6.40
No. of Samples 15 233
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 14.8 34.7
Mean 2.73 18.35 9.90436
Low 0.63 0.35
No. of Samples 15 204
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 24,309.0 53,000.0
Mean 5024.59 31111.31 13627.00058
Low 1252.00 46.582
No. of Samples 15 314
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 77.9 94.2
Mean 73.09 75.38 8.37347
Low 68.036 51.80
No. of Samples 10 225
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2011
Historical
period of record
High 8.5 42.0
Mean 4.0 4.77 4.44269
Low 2.10 0.27
No. of Samples 36 248
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Oysters

Because they are immobile and will tolerate a fairly wide salinity range, eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are valuable as an indicator of the relative health of aquatic ecosystems in the tidally-influenced portions of coastal creeks. Sarasota County has established an oyster monitoring program to track the location, types, and status of oyster reefs. Data from this monitoring program is shown below. Learn more about Oysters »

Loading oyster site map...
Most Recent Sarasota County Oyster Monitoring Program Data
Icon Site ID Year Dead Live Total % Live
1 HUD2 2011 74 176 250 70

Impervious Features

Hudson Bayou is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Rain that falls on land that is in a natural state is absorbed and filtered by soils and vegetation as it makes it way into underground aquifers. However, in developed areas, "impervious surfaces" impede this process and contribute to polluted urban runoff entering surface waters. These surfaces include human infrastructure like roads, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots that are covered by impenetrable materials such as asphalt, concrete, brick and stone, as well as buildings and other permanent structures. Soils that have been disturbed and compacted by urban development are often impervious as well. Learn more about Impervious Features »

The Sarasota County Stormwater Environmental Utility (SEU) mapped impervious surfaces in the County in 2013. A map showing impervious surfaces can be viewed using the Water Atlas Map Viewer tool.

47% of the land area within the Hudson Bayou Basin is covered by impervious surfaces

Impervious Surface Coverage by Type

Land Use / Land Cover

Hudson Bayou is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Land use within a creek's watershed has a major effect on its water quality. In general, less development means better water quality. Land Cover/Land Use classifications categorize land in terms of its observed physical surface characteristics (e.g. upland or wetland), and also reflect the types of activity that are taking place on it (agriculture, urban/built-up, utilities, etc.). Florida uses as its standard a set of statewide classifications which were developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. Learn more about Land Use and Land Cover »

Acreage and Percentage within each Land Use / Land Cover Category for Hudson Bayou Basin
Land Use Classification 1990 1995 1999 2005 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 Trend
Urban & Built-up 2,22492.4% 2,24493.3% 2,24393.2% 2,26093.9% 2,26093.9% 2,24993.5% 2,26093.9% 2,25993.9% 2,25993.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Upland Forests 160.7% 90.4% 90.4% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Water 241% 251% 261.1% 261.1% 271.1% 271.1% 271.1% 271.1% 271.1% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Wetlands 160.7% 130.5% 130.5% 100.4% 100.4% 100.4% 100.4% 100.4% 100.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Transportation and Utilities 1265.2% 1154.8% 1154.8% 1094.6% 1094.6% 1205% 1094.5% 1104.6% 1104.6% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Land Use Chart