Pass
Rating icon - Chlorophyll a Rating icon - Total Nitrogen Rating icon - Total Phosphorous Rating icon - Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

4 out of 4 primary indicators were rated as PASS.

"Primary" are nutrient related (Chl, N, P) and bacteria (B) parameters.

All four indicators must pass for the creek to be rated as PASS.

Greyed out values indicate no data for the report year.

  • Size: 6,399 acres
  • Location: Central Sarasota County
  • Discharges into: Roberts Bay (Venice)

For more information, please see: Curry Creek Basin Master Plan Update, Venice County Model (2001)

View county-wide water quality trends »

Curry Creek

Water Chemistry Ratings

Monitoring data is analyzed to determine stream health based on State water quality standards. Official determination of impairment or attainment of the water quality standards is performed by FDEP and is based on at least three years and up to seven and a half years of data. Information on approximately 17 different parameters are collected at stream sites, but only total nitrogen, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, dissolved oxygen (percent saturation), and bacteria are assessed according to established water quality criteria mandated by the Clean Water Act. Additionally, the floral and faunal communities (SCI) are assessed at some sites to determine whether waters support a healthy aquatic community.

The "pass/fail" conditions presented here do not indicate impairment as determined by the official Florida Department of Environmental Protection Impaired Waters Rule assessment but, rather, give an indication of stream condition in a particular year in relation to the set regulatory numeric limits. Streams receive an annual "PASS" rating for each parameter if the mean value is below the regulatory value and a "FAIL" rating if the mean value exceeds the regulatory value. Not all water quality parameters have an established numeric criterion, so only some of the graphs below show the regulatory limit, represented by a horizontal red line.

Chart Legend
  • Monthly Average
  • Threshold
  • Annual Mean

The graphs here illustrate results over the past five years. Data from sites monitored within a single waterbody identification basin (WBID) are combined to determine water quality status for each WBID, and the annual geometric mean of sample results is indicated on the graph for the most recent year. The table to the left of the graph gives the annual and historic range of values for the indicator.

Click the graph to view a larger image and to download the full dataset.

Freshwater Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 2009
  • 2009B
  • 2009C
  • 2016

Chlorophyll a

Units: µg/l Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 31.80 70.90
Mean 6.4703 8.6402 10.93384
Low 2.36 0.25
No. of Samples 24 616
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 20.00 µg/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 1.511 2.697
Mean 1.1102 1.0978 0.38238918
Low 0.566 0.221
No. of Samples 9 324
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 1.65 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 0.737 0.833
Mean 0.2887 0.2499 0.16419586
Low 0.106 0.043
No. of Samples 22 645
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 0.49 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Units: percent (%) Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 78.70 166.80
Mean 42.54 57.64 23.51178
Low 19.60 1.70
No. of Samples 22 746
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 38.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 1.94 6.58
Mean 1.28 1.37 0.77214
Low 1.00 0.50
No. of Samples 22 586
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 350.00 400.00
Mean 107.06 102.39 80.83352
Low 35.00 20.00
No. of Samples 24 163
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Escherichia coli

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 1450.00 1450.00
Mean 213.37 118.38 303.18454
Low 10.00 10.00
No. of Samples 12 39
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 0.132 25.57
Mean 0.13 0.02 1.00363011
Low 0.131 0.00
No. of Samples 2 675
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 1.90 26.19
Mean 1.08 1.05 1.06707191
Low 0.543 0.188
No. of Samples 24 687
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 0.245 0.79
Mean 0.09 0.06 0.0846735
Low 0.016 0.00
No. of Samples 9 617
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 7.80 8.90
Mean 7.34 7.58 0.30018
Low 6.60 5.52
No. of Samples 46 4,333
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 32.00 78.50
Mean 3.04 11.28 15.78424
Low 0.10 0.00
No. of Samples 21 4,194
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 48343.00 61277.60
Mean 4879.17 15655.86 16343.33116
Low 166.00 0.286
No. of Samples 22 4,338
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 86.18 3574.40
Mean 77.77 74.16 54.74074
Low 68.324 47.858
No. of Samples 22 4,153
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2017
Historical
period of record
High 5.40 40.00
Mean 2.08 2.68 1.89483
Low 1.20 0.70
No. of Samples 20 713
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Tidal Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1991G
  • 2009A
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Oysters

Because they are immobile and will tolerate a fairly wide salinity range, eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are valuable as an indicator of the relative health of aquatic ecosystems in the tidally-influenced portions of coastal creeks. Sarasota County has established an oyster monitoring program to track the location, types, and status of oyster reefs. Data from this monitoring program is shown below. Learn more about Oysters »

Loading oyster site map...
Most Recent Sarasota County Oyster Monitoring Program Data
Icon Site ID Year Dead Live Total % Live
1 CC1 2017 87 87 174 50
2 CC2 2017 43 13 56 23

Impervious Features

Curry Creek is located within the Dona and Roberts Bay Watershed. View details about the Dona and Roberts Bay Watershed »

Rain that falls on land that is in a natural state is absorbed and filtered by soils and vegetation as it makes it way into underground aquifers. However, in developed areas, "impervious surfaces" impede this process and contribute to polluted urban runoff entering surface waters. These surfaces include human infrastructure like roads, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots that are covered by impenetrable materials such as asphalt, concrete, brick and stone, as well as buildings and other permanent structures. Soils that have been disturbed and compacted by urban development are often impervious as well. Learn more about Impervious Features »

The Sarasota County Stormwater Environmental Utility (SEU) mapped impervious surfaces in the County in 2013. A map showing impervious surfaces can be viewed using the Water Atlas Map Viewer tool.

13% of the land area within the Curry Creek Basin is covered by impervious surfaces

Impervious Surface Coverage by Type

Land Use / Land Cover

Curry Creek is located within the Dona and Roberts Bay Watershed. View details about the Dona and Roberts Bay Watershed »

Land use within a creek's watershed has a major effect on its water quality. In general, less development means better water quality. Land Cover/Land Use classifications categorize land in terms of its observed physical surface characteristics (e.g. upland or wetland), and also reflect the types of activity that are taking place on it (agriculture, urban/built-up, utilities, etc.). Florida uses as its standard a set of statewide classifications which were developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. Learn more about Land Use and Land Cover »

Acreage and Percentage within each Land Use / Land Cover Category for Curry Creek Basin
Land Use Classification 1990 1995 1999 2005 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 Trend
Urban & Built-up 2,08932.7% 2,33136.4% 2,91545.6% 3,50454.8% 3,62156.6% 3,51955% 3,82559.8% 4,02562.9% 4,27666.8% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Agriculture 1,53223.9% 1,37421.5% 1,20118.8% 73611.5% 3856% 3695.8% 2704.2% 2253.5% 1562.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Rangeland 1742.7% 2123.3% 1882.9% 751.2% 3175% 3225% 2143.3% 1532.4% 1121.7% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Upland Forests 1,45222.7% 1,22919.2% 82612.9% 76712% 70711.1% 81312.7% 70111% 5358.4% 4046.3% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Water 3505.5% 4386.8% 4827.5% 4937.7% 4927.7% 4927.7% 5087.9% 5498.6% 5598.7% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Wetlands 5268.2% 4637.2% 4617.2% 4837.6% 5228.2% 5228.2% 5198.1% 5108% 4887.6% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Barren Land 80.1% 210.3% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Transportation and Utilities 2664.2% 3305.2% 3265.1% 3415.3% 3545.5% 3625.7% 3605.6% 4026.3% 4046.3% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Land Use Chart