Caution
Rating icon - Chlorophyll a Rating icon - Total Nitrogen Rating icon - Total Phosphorous Rating icon - Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

3 out of 4 indicators were rated as PASS.

All four indicators must pass for the creek to be rated as PASS.

Learn more about how this report is created

  • Size: 35,771 acres
  • Location: North Sarasota County, south Manatee County
  • Discharges into: Sarasota Bay

For more information, please see: Phillippi Creek Flood Study Update (2001)

View county-wide water quality trends »

Phillippi Creek

Phillippi Creek

Water Chemistry Ratings | Freshwater Portion of the Creek

Creek Conditions Ratings are based on comparing nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorophyll and dissolved oxygen to water quality guidelines or regulations. Florida law defines a maximum allowable concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus, and chlorophyll a, and a minimum allowable concentration of dissolved oxygen in these streams. Learn more about these ratings and how they are calculated »

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1937
  • 1941
  • 1966
  • 1971
  • 1971A
Chart Legend
  • Trend Line
  • Annual Mean
  • Threshold
Pass

Chlorophyll a

Score: Pass
Units: ug/l Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 902.00 902.00
Mean 4.9661 4.3336 37.51057
Low 0.293 0.00
No. of Samples 326 3,799

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean
Pass

Nitrogen, Total

Score: Pass
Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 21.845 21.845
Mean 1.5192 1.3609 2.2501185
Low 0.542 0.124
No. of Samples 307 3,193

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean
Pass

Phosphorus, Total

Score: Pass
Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 3.53 7.36
Mean 0.3175 0.386 0.36801193
Low 0.032 0.032
No. of Samples 307 4,178

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean
Pass

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Low DO saturation also may be naturally influenced by inflows from nearby wetlands or groundwater sources.
Score: Pass
Units: percent (%) Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 134.208 262.40
Mean 62.23 66.43 31.69689
Low 0.4785 0.00
No. of Samples 164 4,021

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 17.50 21.30
Mean 1.59 1.31 1.84404
Low 1.00 0.071
No. of Samples 286 3,364

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 600.00 600.00
Mean 71.58 71.96 41.2447
Low 2.50 0.00
No. of Samples 307 4,977

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Escherichia coli

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 11199.00 24196.00
Mean 1185.61 795.22 2937.28576
Low 31.00 10.00
No. of Samples 281 1,749

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 19.60 19.60
Mean 0.06 0.03 1.49872656
Low 0.006 0.00
No. of Samples 307 4,462

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 21.70 21.70
Mean 1.17 1.02 1.87403921
Low 0.46 0.002
No. of Samples 307 4,519

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 3.70 7.556
Mean 0.19 0.15 0.37189576
Low 0.004 0.00
No. of Samples 307 4,107

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 9.90 12.00
Mean 7.46 7.33 0.64331
Low 6.38 0.078
No. of Samples 164 5,050

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 2.2467 31.60
Mean 0.31 0.3 1.13247
Low 0.0803 0.00
No. of Samples 163 3,350

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: umho Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 4184.30 51500.00
Mean 640.59 644.25 1671.26665
Low 169.242 0.369
No. of Samples 173 6,449

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: deg F Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 88.1649 211.586
Mean 75.27 74.02 10.07465
Low 57.2623 32.00
No. of Samples 164 5,071

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 20.00 240.00
Mean 5.88 4.39 10.75219
Low 2.00 0.091
No. of Samples 21 3,886

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Water Chemistry Ratings | Tidal Portion of the Creek

Creek Conditions Ratings are based on comparing nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorophyll and dissolved oxygen to water quality guidelines or regulations. Florida law defines a maximum allowable concentration of chlorophyll a and a minimum allowable concentration of dissolved oxygen in these streams. Florida has no regulatory thresholds for nitrogen or phosphorus in tidal creeks so trends are used to rate the creeks. Learn more about these ratings and how they are calculated »

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1947
  • 1968D
Chart Legend
  • Trend Line
  • Annual Mean
  • Threshold
Pass

Chlorophyll a

Score: Pass
Units: ug/l Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 30.8 99.1
Mean 7.6516 7.9189 9.3091
Low 0.931 0.25
No. of Samples 24 460

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

We were unable to determine a trend for the data available.
Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 1.5 8.9
Mean 0.8272 1.0122 1.197454
Low 0.395 0.131
No. of Samples 24 333

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

We were unable to determine a trend for the data available.
Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 0.5 2.2
Mean 0.3431 0.3055 0.20585294
Low 0.153 0.084
No. of Samples 24 505

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean
Caution

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Low DO saturation also may be naturally influenced by inflows from nearby wetlands or groundwater sources
Score: Caution
Units: percent (%) Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 89.1 210.0
Mean 52.12 61.74 25.36724
Low 29.5161 1.10
No. of Samples 12 432

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 2.5 7.5
Mean 1.37 1.39 0.80116
Low 1.00 0.50
No. of Samples 24 408

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 80.0 280.0
Mean 44.9 50.63 35.21428
Low 20.00 7.00
No. of Samples 24 534

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Enterococcus Group Bacteria

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 4,400.0 41,000.0
Mean 758.96 559.13 4208.11602
Low 70.00 10.00
No. of Samples 24 102

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 0.7 0.9
Mean 0.07 0.03 0.08829239
Low 0.008 0.00
No. of Samples 24 557

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 1.2 3.1
Mean 0.66 0.82 0.34394441
Low 0.308 0.07
No. of Samples 24 550

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 0.7 1.1
Mean 0.09 0.08 0.15091093
Low 0.004 0.00
No. of Samples 24 501

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 7.6 8.5
Mean 7.34 7.66 0.34955
Low 7.10 5.58
No. of Samples 12 2,035

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 30.3 37.5
Mean 11.16 13.82 11.40205
Low 1.6971 0.00
No. of Samples 12 2,425

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: umho Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 45,913.4 55,333.0
Mean 18472.94 19248.96 16225.92273
Low 3206.41 0.30
No. of Samples 12 2,084

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: deg F Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 85.9 211.6
Mean 77.17 75.46 6.66621
Low 66.1714 49.10
No. of Samples 12 1,955

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 21.0
Mean 4.03 2.62028
Low 1.30
No. of Samples 0 486

Five-year Rolling Average

  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Oysters

Because they are immobile and will tolerate a fairly wide salinity range, eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are valuable as an indicator of the relative health of aquatic ecosystems in the tidally-influenced portions of coastal creeks. Sarasota County has established an oyster monitoring program to track the location, types, and status of oyster reefs. Data from this monitoring program is shown below. Learn more about Oysters »

Loading oyster site map...
Most Recent Sarasota County Oyster Monitoring Program Data
Icon Site ID Year Dead Live Total % Live
1 PH3 2019 28 38 66 57

Impervious Features

Phillippi Creek is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Rain that falls on land that is in a natural state is absorbed and filtered by soils and vegetation as it makes it way into underground aquifers. However, in developed areas, "impervious surfaces" impede this process and contribute to polluted urban runoff entering surface waters. These surfaces include human infrastructure like roads, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots that are covered by impenetrable materials such as asphalt, concrete, brick and stone, as well as buildings and other permanent structures. Soils that have been disturbed and compacted by urban development are often impervious as well. Learn more about Impervious Features »

The Sarasota County Stormwater Environmental Utility (SEU) mapped impervious surfaces in the County in 2013. A map showing impervious surfaces can be viewed using the Water Atlas Map Viewer tool.

20% of the land area within the Phillippi Creek Basin is covered by impervious surfaces

Impervious Surface Coverage by Type

Land Use / Land Cover

Phillippi Creek is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Land use within a creek's watershed has a major effect on its water quality. In general, less development means better water quality. Land Cover/Land Use classifications categorize land in terms of its observed physical surface characteristics (e.g. upland or wetland), and also reflect the types of activity that are taking place on it (agriculture, urban/built-up, utilities, etc.). Florida uses as its standard a set of statewide classifications which were developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. Learn more about Land Use and Land Cover »

Acreage and Percentage within each Land Use / Land Cover Category for Phillippi Creek Basin
Land Use Classification 1990 1995 1999 2005 2011 2014 2017 2020 Trend
Urban & Built-up 20,77358.1% 22,10961.8% 23,05164.4% 25,70071.8% 26,06672.9% 25,76872% 26,46074% 27,12475.8% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Agriculture 6,39817.9% 6,01816.8% 4,65713% 2,4987% 2,2166.2% 2,3096.5% 1,8225.1% 1,3183.7% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Rangeland 5231.5% 3080.9% 2620.7% 1420.4% 1470.4% 3300.9% 1290.4% 1290.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Upland Forests 3,3729.4% 2,6197.3% 2,3636.6% 1,9055.3% 1,7244.8% 1,7715% 1,6184.5% 1,4394% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Water 1,1713.3% 1,3673.8% 1,6064.5% 1,8585.2% 2,0275.7% 1,8835.3% 1,9975.6% 2,0635.8% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Wetlands 2,2736.4% 1,7624.9% 1,7354.8% 1,7154.8% 1,7274.8% 1,8605.2% 1,8195.1% 1,8105.1% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Barren Land 190.1% 1060.3% 6341.8% 90% 990.3% 950.3% 1000.3% 650.2% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Transportation and Utilities 1,2443.5% 1,4814.1% 1,4644.1% 1,9435.4% 1,7674.9% 1,7554.9% 1,8265.1% 1,8235.1% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Land Use Chart