Pass
Rating icon - Chlorophyll a Rating icon - Total Nitrogen Rating icon - Total Phosphorous Rating icon - Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

4 out of 4 primary indicators were rated as PASS.

"Primary" are nutrient related (Chl, N, P) and bacteria (B) parameters.

All four indicators must pass for the creek to be rated as PASS.

Greyed out values indicate no data for the report year.

  • Size: 4,967 acres
  • Location: North Sarasota County, south Manatee County
  • Discharges into: Sarasota Bay

For more information, please see: Sarasota Bay Water Quality Management Plan (2012)

View county-wide water quality trends »

Whitaker Bayou

Water Chemistry Ratings

Monitoring data is analyzed to determine stream health based on State water quality standards. Official determination of impairment or attainment of the water quality standards is performed by FDEP and is based on at least three years and up to seven and a half years of data. Information on approximately 17 different parameters are collected at stream sites, but only total nitrogen, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, dissolved oxygen (percent saturation), and bacteria are assessed according to established water quality criteria mandated by the Clean Water Act. Additionally, the floral and faunal communities (SCI) are assessed at some sites to determine whether waters support a healthy aquatic community.

The "pass/fail" conditions presented here do not indicate impairment as determined by the official Florida Department of Environmental Protection Impaired Waters Rule assessment but, rather, give an indication of stream condition in a particular year in relation to the set regulatory numeric limits. Streams receive an annual "PASS" rating for each parameter if the mean value is below the regulatory value and a "FAIL" rating if the mean value exceeds the regulatory value. Not all water quality parameters have an established numeric criterion, so only some of the graphs below show the regulatory limit, represented by a horizontal red line.

Chart Legend
  • Monthly Average
  • Threshold
  • Annual Mean

The graphs here illustrate results over the past five years. Data from sites monitored within a single waterbody identification basin (WBID) are combined to determine water quality status for each WBID, and the annual geometric mean of sample results is indicated on the graph for the most recent year. The table to the left of the graph gives the annual and historic range of values for the indicator.

Click the graph to view a larger image and to download the full dataset.

Freshwater Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1936A

Chlorophyll a

Units: µg/l Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 14.00 59.50
Mean 1.5536 1.8441 5.39017
Low 0.301 0.00
No. of Samples 22 577
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 20.00 µg/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 1.87 15.76
Mean 1.1149 0.9104 1.55764296
Low 0.757 0.30
No. of Samples 16 338
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 1.65 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 0.462 2.38
Mean 0.2356 0.3046 0.22873997
Low 0.094 0.082
No. of Samples 18 591
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 0.49 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Units: percent (%) Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 124.00 262.30
Mean 64.08 84.82 42.34723
Low 29.00 7.0588
No. of Samples 18 701
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 38.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 1.00 175.00
Mean 0.75 0.88 17.40572
Low 0.50 0.50
No. of Samples 13 525
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 100.00 220.00
Mean 54.01 74.54 34.39869
Low 40.00 20.00
No. of Samples 11 135
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Escherichia coli

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 8664.00 14136.00
Mean 2069.6 3994.05 3707.1822
Low 97.00 97.00
No. of Samples 13 27
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 0.12 30.06
Mean 0.03 0.02 2.18143686
Low 0.008 0.00
No. of Samples 8 650
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 1.48 15.36
Mean 0.88 0.78 1.11946347
Low 0.581 0.20
No. of Samples 18 634
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 0.57 1.02
Mean 0.22 0.08 0.15921007
Low 0.031 0.00
No. of Samples 17 604
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 8.02 11.77
Mean 7.59 7.67 0.37242
Low 7.00 6.10
No. of Samples 31 851
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 23.40 23.40
Mean 0.62 0.39 1.5444
Low 0.20 0.00
No. of Samples 15 691
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 41859.00 49645.00
Mean 1501.51 660.17 4795.43444
Low 444.00 0.524
No. of Samples 18 892
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 86.27 91.40
Mean 72.98 69.17 9.37022
Low 55.202 14.018
No. of Samples 17 777
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 7.20 56.40
Mean 1.66 2.93 5.24917
Low 0.61 0.50
No. of Samples 18 657
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Tidal Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1936
Pass

Chlorophyll a

Score: Pass
Units: µg/l Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 128.0 128.0
Mean 6.85 12.1443 24.6145
Low 0.497 0.38
No. of Samples 13 195
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 11.00 ug/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

We were unable to determine a trend for the data available.
Units: mg/L Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 1.8 7.0
Mean 1.4025 1.1493 1.45761898
Low 0.873 0.054
No. of Samples 6 136
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

We were unable to determine a trend for the data available.
Units: mg/L Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 0.3 2.0
Mean 0.1999 0.2371 0.3925048
Low 0.054 0.038
No. of Samples 10 239
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Pass

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Score: Pass
Units: percent (%) Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 104.0 381.3
Mean 63.2 63.34 30.11803
Low 21.50 0.00
No. of Samples 13 582
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 56.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 9.7 12.7
Mean 1.94 2.41 2.23386
Low 1.00 0.543
No. of Samples 13 182
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 110.0 200.0
Mean 40.74 53.4 28.93326
Low 20.00 10.00
No. of Samples 11 145
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Enterococcus Group Bacteria

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 1,600.0 4,800.0
Mean 160.67 236.78 1252.52508
Low 20.00 20.00
No. of Samples 13 27
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 0.2 1.9
Mean 0.09 0.01 0.18525994
Low 0.008 0.00
No. of Samples 6 289
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 1.8 6.3
Mean 0.87 0.87 0.92570304
Low 0.509 0.05
No. of Samples 13 285
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 0.4 3.3
Mean 0.08 0.07 0.35950627
Low 0.004 0.004
No. of Samples 6 237
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 8.2 8.8
Mean 7.84 7.61 0.40643
Low 7.50 4.90
No. of Samples 26 2,852
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 34.2 45.0
Mean 31.74 6.01 15.34878
Low 28.00 0.00
No. of Samples 13 2,890
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 52,080.0 55,760.0
Mean 48843.11 7227.77 22667.68254
Low 44091.00 320.00
No. of Samples 13 2,696
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 91.0 95.5
Mean 77.12 74.54 6.10831
Low 59.126 49.10
No. of Samples 12 3,033
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2016
Historical
period of record
High 12.0 31.3
Mean 4.29 3.84 3.31287
Low 2.50 0.62
No. of Samples 13 551
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Oysters

Because they are immobile and will tolerate a fairly wide salinity range, eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are valuable as an indicator of the relative health of aquatic ecosystems in the tidally-influenced portions of coastal creeks. Sarasota County has established an oyster monitoring program to track the location, types, and status of oyster reefs. Data from this monitoring program is shown below. Learn more about Oysters »

Loading oyster site map...
Most Recent Sarasota County Oyster Monitoring Program Data
Icon Site ID Year Dead Live Total % Live

Impervious Features

Whitaker Bayou is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Rain that falls on land that is in a natural state is absorbed and filtered by soils and vegetation as it makes it way into underground aquifers. However, in developed areas, "impervious surfaces" impede this process and contribute to polluted urban runoff entering surface waters. These surfaces include human infrastructure like roads, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots that are covered by impenetrable materials such as asphalt, concrete, brick and stone, as well as buildings and other permanent structures. Soils that have been disturbed and compacted by urban development are often impervious as well. Learn more about Impervious Features »

The Sarasota County Stormwater Environmental Utility (SEU) mapped impervious surfaces in the County in 2013. A map showing impervious surfaces can be viewed using the Water Atlas Map Viewer tool.

27% of the land area within the Whitaker Bayou Basin is covered by impervious surfaces

Impervious Surface Coverage by Type

Land Use / Land Cover

Whitaker Bayou is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Land use within a creek's watershed has a major effect on its water quality. In general, less development means better water quality. Land Cover/Land Use classifications categorize land in terms of its observed physical surface characteristics (e.g. upland or wetland), and also reflect the types of activity that are taking place on it (agriculture, urban/built-up, utilities, etc.). Florida uses as its standard a set of statewide classifications which were developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. Learn more about Land Use and Land Cover »

Acreage and Percentage within each Land Use / Land Cover Category for Whitaker Bayou Basin
Land Use Classification 1990 1995 1999 2005 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 Trend
Urban & Built-up 3,83077.1% 3,83477.2% 3,83177.1% 3,90378.6% 3,95279.6% 3,92179% 3,95179.6% 3,97079.9% 4,00680.7% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Agriculture 2144.3% 1823.7% 1883.8% 1813.6% 1813.6% 1813.6% 1783.6% 1683.4% 1202.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Rangeland 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 120.2% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Upland Forests 2354.7% 2495% 2495% 1953.9% 1643.3% 1953.9% 1643.3% 1583.2% 1432.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Water 1302.6% 1372.7% 1402.8% 1262.5% 881.8% 881.8% 891.8% 911.8% 1172.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Wetlands 3156.4% 2324.7% 2274.6% 2294.6% 2224.5% 2224.5% 2224.5% 2214.4% 2074.2% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Barren Land 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 30.1% 00% 190.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Transportation and Utilities 2384.8% 3296.6% 3296.6% 3286.6% 3567.2% 3567.2% 3557.2% 3567.2% 3436.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Land Use Chart