Caution
Rating icon - Chlorophyll a Rating icon - Total Nitrogen Rating icon - Total Phosphorous Rating icon - Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

3 out of 4 primary indicators were rated as PASS.

"Primary" are nutrient related (Chl, N, P) and bacteria (B) parameters.

All four indicators must pass for the creek to be rated as PASS.

Greyed out values indicate no data for the report year.

  • Size: 4,967 acres
  • Location: North Sarasota County, south Manatee County
  • Discharges into: Sarasota Bay

For more information, please see: Sarasota Bay Water Quality Management Plan (2012)

View county-wide water quality trends »

Whitaker Bayou

Water Chemistry Ratings

Monitoring data is analyzed to determine stream health based on State water quality standards. Official determination of impairment or attainment of the water quality standards is performed by FDEP and is based on at least three years and up to seven and a half years of data. Information on approximately 17 different parameters are collected at stream sites, but only total nitrogen, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, dissolved oxygen (percent saturation), and bacteria are assessed according to established water quality criteria mandated by the Clean Water Act. Additionally, the floral and faunal communities (SCI) are assessed at some sites to determine whether waters support a healthy aquatic community.

The "pass/fail" conditions presented here do not indicate impairment as determined by the official Florida Department of Environmental Protection Impaired Waters Rule assessment but, rather, give an indication of stream condition in a particular year in relation to the set regulatory numeric limits. Streams receive an annual "PASS" rating for each parameter if the mean value is below the regulatory value and a "FAIL" rating if the mean value exceeds the regulatory value. Not all water quality parameters have an established numeric criterion, so only some of the graphs below show the regulatory limit, represented by a horizontal red line.

Chart Legend
  • Monthly Average
  • Threshold
  • Annual Mean

The graphs here illustrate results over the past five years. Data from sites monitored within a single waterbody identification basin (WBID) are combined to determine water quality status for each WBID, and the annual geometric mean of sample results is indicated on the graph for the most recent year. The table to the left of the graph gives the annual and historic range of values for the indicator.

Click the graph to view a larger image and to download the full dataset.

Freshwater Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1936A

Chlorophyll a

Units: µg/l Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 25.70 59.50
Mean 1.1887 1.6589 5.90094
Low 0.25 0.00
No. of Samples 24 661
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 20.00 µg/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 1.452 15.76
Mean 0.8315 0.8837 1.40639906
Low 0.581 0.0019
No. of Samples 24 419
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 1.65 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 0.414 2.38
Mean 0.2636 0.295 0.21861874
Low 0.128 0.082
No. of Samples 24 675
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 0.49 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Units: percent (%) Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 126.40 262.30
Mean 85.74 83.25 41.4616
Low 53.90 7.0588
No. of Samples 15 770
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 38.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 1.09 175.00
Mean 1.01 0.89 16.23746
Low 1.00 0.50
No. of Samples 22 604
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 130.00 220.00
Mean 55.92 67.97 26.99616
Low 40.00 20.00
No. of Samples 24 795
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Escherichia coli

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 15531.00 15531.00
Mean 2298.69 3371.27 3360.33291
Low 670.00 97.00
No. of Samples 27 113
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 0.123 30.06
Mean 0.01 0.02 2.03479262
Low 0.008 0.00
No. of Samples 24 748
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 1.10 15.36
Mean 0.66 0.77 1.05571699
Low 0.461 0.20
No. of Samples 24 718
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 0.483 1.02
Mean 0.12 0.09 0.15784593
Low 0.033 0.00
No. of Samples 24 689
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 8.29 11.77
Mean 7.68 7.67 0.36059
Low 7.12 6.10
No. of Samples 15 942
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 0.4754 23.40
Mean 0.28 0.39 1.46791
Low 0.16 0.00
No. of Samples 18 766
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 956.315 49645.00
Mean 599.07 670.8 4622.22353
Low 334.00 0.524
No. of Samples 15 961
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 87.1849 91.40
Mean 75.15 69.63 9.36059
Low 59.666 14.018
No. of Samples 15 844
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 56.40
Mean 2.84 5.15974
Low 0.50
No. of Samples 0 689
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Tidal Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1936
Caution

Chlorophyll a

Score: Caution
Units: µg/l Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 137.0 196.0
Mean 13.5473 11.9536 29.15191
Low 2.56 0.38
No. of Samples 24 278
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 11.00 ug/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

We were unable to determine a trend for the data available.
Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 1.2 7.0
Mean 0.697 0.9637 1.2393889
Low 0.462 0.0018
No. of Samples 24 210
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

We were unable to determine a trend for the data available.
Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 0.3 2.0
Mean 0.1274 0.2041 0.35012737
Low 0.05 0.008
No. of Samples 24 325
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Pass

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Score: Pass
Units: percent (%) Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 106.5 827.0
Mean 85.11 63.56 66.49465
Low 46.5104 0.00
No. of Samples 12 647
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 56.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 4.4 12.7
Mean 2.34 2.39 2.15874
Low 1.00 0.543
No. of Samples 22 261
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 65.0 200.0
Mean 29.87 38.1 27.82779
Low 15.00 5.00
No. of Samples 24 421
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Enterococcus Group Bacteria

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 2,500.0 17,000.0
Mean 240.54 282.84 3229.23166
Low 20.00 10.00
No. of Samples 24 110
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 0.8 1.9
Mean 0.1 0.02 0.18293732
Low 0.008 0.00
No. of Samples 24 382
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 1.0 6.3
Mean 0.61 0.85 0.83263779
Low 0.433 0.05
No. of Samples 24 368
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 0.2 3.3
Mean 0.05 0.06 0.31524464
Low 0.007 0.004
No. of Samples 24 327
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 8.2 9.6
Mean 7.86 7.62 0.40984
Low 7.68 4.90
No. of Samples 12 2,940
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 33.8 45.0
Mean 32.44 6.25 15.32413
Low 29.3116 0.00
No. of Samples 12 2,961
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 50,772.6 55,760.0
Mean 48901.57 7553.57 22709.25858
Low 44562.50 320.00
No. of Samples 12 2,761
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 87.9 95.5
Mean 78.41 74.63 6.17786
Low 63.3196 49.10
No. of Samples 12 3,098
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2019
Historical
period of record
High 31.3
Mean 3.86 3.24727
Low 0.62
No. of Samples 0 582
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Oysters

Because they are immobile and will tolerate a fairly wide salinity range, eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are valuable as an indicator of the relative health of aquatic ecosystems in the tidally-influenced portions of coastal creeks. Sarasota County has established an oyster monitoring program to track the location, types, and status of oyster reefs. Data from this monitoring program is shown below. Learn more about Oysters »

Loading oyster site map...
Most Recent Sarasota County Oyster Monitoring Program Data
Icon Site ID Year Dead Live Total % Live

Impervious Features

Whitaker Bayou is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Rain that falls on land that is in a natural state is absorbed and filtered by soils and vegetation as it makes it way into underground aquifers. However, in developed areas, "impervious surfaces" impede this process and contribute to polluted urban runoff entering surface waters. These surfaces include human infrastructure like roads, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots that are covered by impenetrable materials such as asphalt, concrete, brick and stone, as well as buildings and other permanent structures. Soils that have been disturbed and compacted by urban development are often impervious as well. Learn more about Impervious Features »

The Sarasota County Stormwater Environmental Utility (SEU) mapped impervious surfaces in the County in 2013. A map showing impervious surfaces can be viewed using the Water Atlas Map Viewer tool.

27% of the land area within the Whitaker Bayou Basin is covered by impervious surfaces

Impervious Surface Coverage by Type

Land Use / Land Cover

Whitaker Bayou is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Land use within a creek's watershed has a major effect on its water quality. In general, less development means better water quality. Land Cover/Land Use classifications categorize land in terms of its observed physical surface characteristics (e.g. upland or wetland), and also reflect the types of activity that are taking place on it (agriculture, urban/built-up, utilities, etc.). Florida uses as its standard a set of statewide classifications which were developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. Learn more about Land Use and Land Cover »

Acreage and Percentage within each Land Use / Land Cover Category for Whitaker Bayou Basin
Land Use Classification 1990 1995 1999 2005 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 Trend
Urban & Built-up 3,83077.1% 3,83477.2% 3,83177.1% 3,90378.6% 3,95279.6% 3,92179% 3,95179.6% 3,97079.9% 4,00680.7% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Agriculture 2144.3% 1823.7% 1883.8% 1813.6% 1813.6% 1813.6% 1783.6% 1683.4% 1202.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Rangeland 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 120.2% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Upland Forests 2354.7% 2495% 2495% 1953.9% 1643.3% 1953.9% 1643.3% 1583.2% 1432.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Water 1302.6% 1372.7% 1402.8% 1262.5% 881.8% 881.8% 891.8% 911.8% 1172.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Wetlands 3156.4% 2324.7% 2274.6% 2294.6% 2224.5% 2224.5% 2224.5% 2214.4% 2074.2% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Barren Land 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 30.1% 00% 190.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Transportation and Utilities 2384.8% 3296.6% 3296.6% 3286.6% 3567.2% 3567.2% 3557.2% 3567.2% 3436.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Land Use Chart