Caution
Rating icon - Chlorophyll a Rating icon - Total Nitrogen Rating icon - Total Phosphorous Rating icon - Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

3 out of 4 primary indicators were rated as PASS.

"Primary" are nutrient related (Chl, N, P) and bacteria (B) parameters.

All four indicators must pass for the creek to be rated as PASS.

Greyed out values indicate no data for the report year.

  • Size: 4,967 acres
  • Location: North Sarasota County, south Manatee County
  • Discharges into: Sarasota Bay

For more information, please see: Sarasota Bay Water Quality Management Plan (2012)

View county-wide water quality trends »

Whitaker Bayou

Water Chemistry Ratings

Monitoring data is analyzed to determine stream health based on State water quality standards. Official determination of impairment or attainment of the water quality standards is performed by FDEP and is based on at least three years and up to seven and a half years of data. Information on approximately 17 different parameters are collected at stream sites, but only total nitrogen, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, dissolved oxygen (percent saturation), and bacteria are assessed according to established water quality criteria mandated by the Clean Water Act. Additionally, the floral and faunal communities (SCI) are assessed at some sites to determine whether waters support a healthy aquatic community.

The "pass/fail" conditions presented here do not indicate impairment as determined by the official Florida Department of Environmental Protection Impaired Waters Rule assessment but, rather, give an indication of stream condition in a particular year in relation to the set regulatory numeric limits. Streams receive an annual "PASS" rating for each parameter if the mean value is below the regulatory value and a "FAIL" rating if the mean value exceeds the regulatory value. Not all water quality parameters have an established numeric criterion, so only some of the graphs below show the regulatory limit, represented by a horizontal red line.

Chart Legend
  • Monthly Average
  • Threshold
  • Annual Mean

The graphs here illustrate results over the past five years. Data from sites monitored within a single waterbody identification basin (WBID) are combined to determine water quality status for each WBID, and the annual geometric mean of sample results is indicated on the graph for the most recent year. The table to the left of the graph gives the annual and historic range of values for the indicator.

Click the graph to view a larger image and to download the full dataset.

Freshwater Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1936A

Chlorophyll a

Units: µg/l Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 10.40 59.50
Mean 1.1122 1.5689 5.68702
Low 0.237 0.00
No. of Samples 12 561
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 20.00 µg/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 1.605 15.76
Mean 0.9038 0.8959 1.27042079
Low 0.534 0.0019
No. of Samples 12 524
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 1.65 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 0.579 2.38
Mean 0.3284 0.2935 0.2083223
Low 0.19 0.082
No. of Samples 12 553
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 0.49 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Units: percent (%) Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 125.991 492.60
Mean 96.65 75.16 42.95045
Low 65.9407 2.20
No. of Samples 12 587
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 38.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 2.42 175.00
Mean 1.13 0.92 17.96486
Low 1.00 0.50
No. of Samples 12 492
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 160.00 330.00
Mean 81.32 69.21 29.80425
Low 55.00 20.00
No. of Samples 12 634
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Escherichia coli

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 14136.00 15531.00
Mean 1707.83 2911.63 3387.46051
Low 602.00 97.00
No. of Samples 12 122
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 0.105 30.06
Mean 0.02 0.02 2.2189588
Low 0.008 0.00
No. of Samples 12 628
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 1.55 15.36
Mean 0.78 0.78 1.15097214
Low 0.361 0.20
No. of Samples 12 596
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 0.306 1.02
Mean 0.09 0.08 0.15552304
Low 0.019 0.00
No. of Samples 12 568
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 8.25 11.77
Mean 7.8 7.65 0.3625
Low 7.2799 6.10
No. of Samples 12 878
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 0.3904 23.40
Mean 0.29 0.39 1.66459
Low 0.1938 0.00
No. of Samples 12 774
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 788.952 49645.00
Mean 596.57 701.51 5310.83152
Low 401.155 0.524
No. of Samples 12 889
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 91.40
Mean 69.65 9.33554
Low 14.018
No. of Samples 0 844
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 56.40
Mean 2.88 5.01445
Low 0.50
No. of Samples 0 566
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Tidal Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1936
Caution

Chlorophyll a

Score: Caution
Units: µg/l Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 101.0 196.0
Mean 22.0875 12.2416 31.28733
Low 1.70 0.38
No. of Samples 18 236
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 11.00 ug/l
  • Annual Mean
Pass

Nitrogen, Total

No trend was observed after performing a trend analysis.
Score: Pass
Units: mg/L Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 1.9 7.0
Mean 0.9247 0.9498 1.17506702
Low 0.557 0.0018
No. of Samples 15 239
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Pass

Phosphorus, Total

No trend was observed after performing a trend analysis.
Score: Pass
Units: mg/L Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 0.4 2.0
Mean 0.2246 0.215 0.36610104
Low 0.112 0.008
No. of Samples 15 280
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Pass

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Score: Pass
Units: percent (%) Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 214.5 827.0
Mean 80.41 63.32 43.27844
Low 19.70 0.00
No. of Samples 19 629
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 56.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 13.7 13.7
Mean 4.2 2.51 2.35135
Low 1.49 0.543
No. of Samples 12 218
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 90.0 200.0
Mean 43.81 39.92 28.22279
Low 15.00 5.00
No. of Samples 12 335
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Enterococcus Group Bacteria

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 12,033.0 17,000.0
Mean 385.12 315.2 3364.69886
Low 10.00 10.00
No. of Samples 18 119
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 1.2 1.9
Mean 0.09 0.02 0.20067858
Low 0.007 0.00
No. of Samples 15 336
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 1.8 6.3
Mean 0.78 0.88 0.87599458
Low 0.318 0.05
No. of Samples 15 323
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 0.5 3.3
Mean 0.06 0.06 0.32857637
Low 0.004 0.004
No. of Samples 15 286
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 8.1 9.6
Mean 7.83 7.62 0.40985
Low 7.34 4.90
No. of Samples 19 2,931
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 34.3 45.0
Mean 30.34 6.34 15.31202
Low 20.6592 0.00
No. of Samples 26 2,988
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 52,330.0 55,760.0
Mean 46053.8 7481.33 22727.87275
Low 32648.80 320.00
No. of Samples 19 2,745
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 90.7 95.5
Mean 84.57 74.66 6.18856
Low 72.32 49.10
No. of Samples 7 3,104
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2020
Historical
period of record
High 12.0 31.3
Mean 4.33 3.79 3.29384
Low 2.50 0.62
No. of Samples 3 537
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Oysters

Because they are immobile and will tolerate a fairly wide salinity range, eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are valuable as an indicator of the relative health of aquatic ecosystems in the tidally-influenced portions of coastal creeks. Sarasota County has established an oyster monitoring program to track the location, types, and status of oyster reefs. Data from this monitoring program is shown below. Learn more about Oysters »

Loading oyster site map...
Most Recent Sarasota County Oyster Monitoring Program Data
Icon Site ID Year Dead Live Total % Live

Impervious Features

Whitaker Bayou is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Rain that falls on land that is in a natural state is absorbed and filtered by soils and vegetation as it makes it way into underground aquifers. However, in developed areas, "impervious surfaces" impede this process and contribute to polluted urban runoff entering surface waters. These surfaces include human infrastructure like roads, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots that are covered by impenetrable materials such as asphalt, concrete, brick and stone, as well as buildings and other permanent structures. Soils that have been disturbed and compacted by urban development are often impervious as well. Learn more about Impervious Features »

The Sarasota County Stormwater Environmental Utility (SEU) mapped impervious surfaces in the County in 2013. A map showing impervious surfaces can be viewed using the Water Atlas Map Viewer tool.

27% of the land area within the Whitaker Bayou Basin is covered by impervious surfaces

Impervious Surface Coverage by Type

Land Use / Land Cover

Whitaker Bayou is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Land use within a creek's watershed has a major effect on its water quality. In general, less development means better water quality. Land Cover/Land Use classifications categorize land in terms of its observed physical surface characteristics (e.g. upland or wetland), and also reflect the types of activity that are taking place on it (agriculture, urban/built-up, utilities, etc.). Florida uses as its standard a set of statewide classifications which were developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. Learn more about Land Use and Land Cover »

Acreage and Percentage within each Land Use / Land Cover Category for Whitaker Bayou Basin
Land Use Classification 1990 1995 1999 2005 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 Trend
Urban & Built-up 3,83077.1% 3,83477.2% 3,83177.1% 3,90378.6% 3,95279.6% 3,92179% 3,95179.6% 3,97079.9% 4,00680.7% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Agriculture 2144.3% 1823.7% 1883.8% 1813.6% 1813.6% 1813.6% 1783.6% 1683.4% 1202.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Rangeland 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 120.2% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Upland Forests 2354.7% 2495% 2495% 1953.9% 1643.3% 1953.9% 1643.3% 1583.2% 1432.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Water 1302.6% 1372.7% 1402.8% 1262.5% 881.8% 881.8% 891.8% 911.8% 1172.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Wetlands 3156.4% 2324.7% 2274.6% 2294.6% 2224.5% 2224.5% 2224.5% 2214.4% 2074.2% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Barren Land 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 30.1% 00% 190.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Transportation and Utilities 2384.8% 3296.6% 3296.6% 3286.6% 3567.2% 3567.2% 3557.2% 3567.2% 3436.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Land Use Chart