Caution
Rating icon - Chlorophyll a Rating icon - Total Nitrogen Rating icon - Total Phosphorous Rating icon - Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

3 out of 4 primary indicators were rated as PASS.

"Primary" are nutrient related (Chl, N, P) and bacteria (B) parameters.

All four indicators must pass for the creek to be rated as PASS.

Greyed out values indicate no data for the report year.

  • Size: 4,967 acres
  • Location: North Sarasota County, south Manatee County
  • Discharges into: Sarasota Bay

For more information, please see: Sarasota Bay Water Quality Management Plan (2012)

View county-wide water quality trends »

Whitaker Bayou

Water Chemistry Ratings

Monitoring data is analyzed to determine stream health based on State water quality standards. Official determination of impairment or attainment of the water quality standards is performed by FDEP and is based on at least three years and up to seven and a half years of data. Information on approximately 17 different parameters are collected at stream sites, but only total nitrogen, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, dissolved oxygen (percent saturation), and bacteria are assessed according to established water quality criteria mandated by the Clean Water Act. Additionally, the floral and faunal communities (SCI) are assessed at some sites to determine whether waters support a healthy aquatic community.

The "pass/fail" conditions presented here do not indicate impairment as determined by the official Florida Department of Environmental Protection Impaired Waters Rule assessment but, rather, give an indication of stream condition in a particular year in relation to the set regulatory numeric limits. Streams receive an annual "PASS" rating for each parameter if the mean value is below the regulatory value and a "FAIL" rating if the mean value exceeds the regulatory value. Not all water quality parameters have an established numeric criterion, so only some of the graphs below show the regulatory limit, represented by a horizontal red line.

Chart Legend
  • Monthly Average
  • Threshold
  • Annual Mean

The graphs here illustrate results over the past five years. Data from sites monitored within a single waterbody identification basin (WBID) are combined to determine water quality status for each WBID, and the annual geometric mean of sample results is indicated on the graph for the most recent year. The table to the left of the graph gives the annual and historic range of values for the indicator.

Click the graph to view a larger image and to download the full dataset.

Freshwater Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1936A

Chlorophyll a

Units: µg/l Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 5.39 59.50
Mean 1.0027 1.529 5.53658
Low 0.306 0.00
No. of Samples 12 574
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 20.00 µg/l
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 1.818 15.76
Mean 0.9408 0.9136 1.38155309
Low 0.496 0.0019
No. of Samples 12 435
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 1.65 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Phosphorus, Total

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.451 2.38
Mean 0.2427 0.2882 0.20727465
Low 0.12 0.082
No. of Samples 12 552
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 0.49 mg/L
  • Annual Mean

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Units: percent (%) Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 110.55 262.30
Mean 75.94 72.41 37.29557
Low 51.73 2.20
No. of Samples 12 586
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 38.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 2.80 175.00
Mean 1.55 0.94 17.87366
Low 1.00 0.50
No. of Samples 9 497
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 60.00 330.00
Mean 38.5 69.73 31.26847
Low 30.00 25.00
No. of Samples 12 613
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Escherichia coli

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 9804.00 15531.00
Mean 4167.46 2562.62 3254.72993
Low 1723.00 97.00
No. of Samples 12 137
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.172 30.06
Mean 0.06 0.02 2.19995853
Low 0.022 0.00
No. of Samples 12 639
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 1.73 15.36
Mean 0.77 0.79 1.14818017
Low 0.321 0.20
No. of Samples 12 600
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.184 1.02
Mean 0.13 0.08 0.15244273
Low 0.078 0.00
No. of Samples 12 555
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 8.08 11.77
Mean 7.65 7.66 0.36833
Low 7.24 6.10
No. of Samples 12 885
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 1.16 45.4582
Mean 0.47 0.41 2.69559
Low 0.18 0.00
No. of Samples 12 704
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 2232.77 66296.20
Mean 945.5 718.68 5878.95524
Low 376.37 0.524
No. of Samples 12 911
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 189.068 192.5672
Mean 170.94 75.23 30.52478
Low 143.3192 46.40
No. of Samples 12 804
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 56.40
Mean 3.02 5.13052
Low 0.50
No. of Samples 0 508
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Tidal Portion of the Creek

Data for the following WBIDs is averaged when compiling the data below:
  • 1936
Pass

Chlorophyll a

Score: Pass
Units: µg/l Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 32.8 196.0
Mean 6.9538 10.3471 28.33973
Low 2.15 0.38
No. of Samples 12 268
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 11.00 ug/l
  • Annual Mean
Caution

Nitrogen, Total

Trend analysis shows a weak increasing trend.
Score: Caution
Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 1.5 7.0
Mean 0.9776 1.0198 1.16389575
Low 0.606 0.0018
No. of Samples 12 240
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Pass

Phosphorus, Total

No trend was observed after performing a trend analysis.
Score: Pass
Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.4 2.0
Mean 0.1856 0.2173 0.35646865
Low 0.108 0.008
No. of Samples 12 289
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Pass

Dissolved Oxygen Saturation

Note: Dissolved oxygen saturation percentages above the regulatory threshold meet established water quality targets.
Score: Pass
Units: percent (%) Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 95.8 381.3
Mean 68.97 64.06 30.37209
Low 50.79 0.00
No. of Samples 12 684
  • Monthly Average
  • NNC 56.00 percent (%)
  • Annual Mean

BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand

Units: mg/l Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 6.5 13.7
Mean 1.89 2.24 2.25425
Low 1.00 0.543
No. of Samples 9 225
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Color

Units: PCU Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 140.0 200.0
Mean 110.69 43.27 31.68252
Low 80.00 5.00
No. of Samples 12 325
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Enterococcus Group Bacteria

Units: MPN/100ml Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 11,199.0 33,000.0
Mean 440.2 357.69 4506.85967
Low 86.00 10.00
No. of Samples 12 161
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Ammonia + Ammonium as N

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.4 1.9
Mean 0.11 0.02 0.22944672
Low 0.048 0.00
No. of Samples 12 353
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 1.3 6.3
Mean 0.84 0.9 0.86202283
Low 0.486 0.05
No. of Samples 12 330
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate as N

Units: mg/L Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 0.2 3.3
Mean 0.12 0.06 0.33143198
Low 0.062 0.004
No. of Samples 12 274
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

pH

Units: None Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 7.9 9.6
Mean 7.67 7.62 0.40696
Low 7.36 4.90
No. of Samples 12 2,962
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Salinity

Units: PSS Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 42.8 45.0
Mean 25.24 6.22 15.33069
Low 13.60 0.00
No. of Samples 12 2,958
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Specific conductance

Units: µmho Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 62,256.0 62,256.0
Mean 38974.12 7723.71 22761.6613
Low 22263.40 320.00
No. of Samples 12 2,799
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Temperature, water

Units: °F Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 197.7 199.3
Mean 176.17 76.05 16.34726
Low 145.2308 49.10
No. of Samples 12 3,109
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean

Turbidity

Units: NTU Year
2025
Historical
period of record
High 87.0
Mean 3.8 6.70498
Low 0.62
No. of Samples 0 496
  • Monthly Average
  • Annual Mean
Other Measures of Creek Health:

Oysters

Because they are immobile and will tolerate a fairly wide salinity range, eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are valuable as an indicator of the relative health of aquatic ecosystems in the tidally-influenced portions of coastal creeks. Sarasota County has established an oyster monitoring program to track the location, types, and status of oyster reefs. Data from this monitoring program is shown below. Learn more about Oysters »

Loading oyster site map...
Most Recent Sarasota County Oyster Monitoring Program Data
Icon Site ID Year Dead Live Total % Live

Impervious Features

Whitaker Bayou is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Rain that falls on land that is in a natural state is absorbed and filtered by soils and vegetation as it makes it way into underground aquifers. However, in developed areas, "impervious surfaces" impede this process and contribute to polluted urban runoff entering surface waters. These surfaces include human infrastructure like roads, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots that are covered by impenetrable materials such as asphalt, concrete, brick and stone, as well as buildings and other permanent structures. Soils that have been disturbed and compacted by urban development are often impervious as well. Learn more about Impervious Features »

The Sarasota County Stormwater Environmental Utility (SEU) mapped impervious surfaces in the County in 2013. A map showing impervious surfaces can be viewed using the Water Atlas Map Viewer tool.

27% of the land area within the Whitaker Bayou Basin is covered by impervious surfaces

Impervious Surface Coverage by Type

Land Use / Land Cover

Whitaker Bayou is located within the Sarasota Bay Watershed. View details about the Sarasota Bay Watershed »

Land use within a creek's watershed has a major effect on its water quality. In general, less development means better water quality. Land Cover/Land Use classifications categorize land in terms of its observed physical surface characteristics (e.g. upland or wetland), and also reflect the types of activity that are taking place on it (agriculture, urban/built-up, utilities, etc.). Florida uses as its standard a set of statewide classifications which were developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. Learn more about Land Use and Land Cover »

Acreage and Percentage within each Land Use / Land Cover Category for Whitaker Bayou Basin
Land Use Classification 1990 1995 1999 2005 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 Trend
Urban & Built-up 3,83077.1% 3,83477.2% 3,83177.1% 3,90378.6% 3,95279.6% 3,92179% 3,95179.6% 3,97079.9% 4,00680.7% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Agriculture 2144.3% 1823.7% 1883.8% 1813.6% 1813.6% 1813.6% 1783.6% 1683.4% 1202.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Rangeland 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 40.1% 120.2% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Upland Forests 2354.7% 2495% 2495% 1953.9% 1643.3% 1953.9% 1643.3% 1583.2% 1432.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Water 1302.6% 1372.7% 1402.8% 1262.5% 881.8% 881.8% 891.8% 911.8% 1172.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Wetlands 3156.4% 2324.7% 2274.6% 2294.6% 2224.5% 2224.5% 2224.5% 2214.4% 2074.2% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Barren Land 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 30.1% 00% 190.4% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Transportation and Utilities 2384.8% 3296.6% 3296.6% 3286.6% 3567.2% 3567.2% 3557.2% 3567.2% 3436.9% Land Use Trend Sparkline
Land Use Chart